Almost anything can cause personal offense these days. Intent goes a long way. They named these teams so in order to pay homage to a culture, not to be derogatory towards them. How can you disregard possibly an equal amount of people who want it to stay because they feel it keeps their culture relevant and gives it attention.dsheinem wrote:i just don't have the energy today![]()
also, BurningDoom, Congress never asked that. Some select members have, but it wasn't a government action or a vote or anything.
And if the name causes personal offense to some and has demonstrable racist origins and connotations, I can't see any good arguments from anyone else to the contrary for keeping it. What value is there in keeping such a name that at least some groups have repeatedly stated is derogatory? Just because other native americans don't care or like the name, that somehow makes it no longer derogatory to the group who asked for the change?
Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
- Jmustang1968
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
My Sales Thread
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
-
AppleQueso
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
They could just as easily use a Native American inspired name that doesn't also, you know, carry derogatory connotations.Jmustang1968 wrote:Almost anything can cause personal offense these days. Intent goes a long way. They named these teams so in order to pay homage to a culture, not to be derogatory towards them. How can you disregard possibly an equal amount of people who want it to stay because they feel it keeps their culture relevant and gives it attention.dsheinem wrote:i just don't have the energy today![]()
also, BurningDoom, Congress never asked that. Some select members have, but it wasn't a government action or a vote or anything.
And if the name causes personal offense to some and has demonstrable racist origins and connotations, I can't see any good arguments from anyone else to the contrary for keeping it. What value is there in keeping such a name that at least some groups have repeatedly stated is derogatory? Just because other native americans don't care or like the name, that somehow makes it no longer derogatory to the group who asked for the change?
Last edited by AppleQueso on Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
I guess I've not seen anything approaching substantive support from native american groups for keeping the name as a way to honor their culture. I've seen plenty to the contrary. I'm sure many don't care. But not caring about it isn't the same as thinking it's a fantastic, noble, respectful nickname.
- samsonlonghair
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5188
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
- Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
So I keep hearing the point that some tribes don't take offense. Doesn't it matter that racism is bad no matter who you are?
I think the teams should show more respect to the indigenous people for whom they are named. Florida State has shown that you can honor a tribe instead of insulting the tribe. In 2005, Florida State successfully defended their team name. The NCAA agreed and granted them an exception.
What's preventing professional teams from showing the same respect that this college team shows?
I think the teams should show more respect to the indigenous people for whom they are named. Florida State has shown that you can honor a tribe instead of insulting the tribe. In 2005, Florida State successfully defended their team name. The NCAA agreed and granted them an exception.
What's preventing professional teams from showing the same respect that this college team shows?
The Cleveland Indians baseball team was founded in 1894 before men of different races played in the same league. The point is that baseball has changed. Tradition is not an excuse for racism.Jmustang1968 wrote:There is also historical tradition with these team names. They were so named before rampant political correctness has taken over.
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
Please keep it civil.Jmustang1968 wrote: Dude you have no idea of what you are talking about. Do you post in every thread just to be apart of the conversation even when you have nothing to contribute?
- Jmustang1968
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
It was civil. He was posting things that had little relevance or offering nothint with substance. I don't care about his stance. I could/couldn't care less.Luke wrote:Please keep it civil.Jmustang1968 wrote: Dude you have no idea of what you are talking about. Do you post in every thread just to be apart of the conversation even when you have nothing to contribute?
My Sales Thread
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
- Jmustang1968
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
It was never said to be noble or fantastic. Thankfully that is not a requirement to become a team name.dsheinem wrote:I guess I've not seen anything approaching substantive support from native american groups for keeping the name as a way to honor their culture. I've seen plenty to the contrary. I'm sure many don't care. But not caring about it isn't the same as thinking it's a fantastic, noble, respectful nickname.
My Sales Thread
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
Civil: courteous and polite.Jmustang1968 wrote: I don't care about his stance. I could/couldn't care less.
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
As much as I hate "Political Correctness" changing everything around us, I voted Yes since the label does seem derogatory to a group of people. Does not matter if it only affects a small percentage of the population if it is perceived as a racial slur.
This reminds me when I was in the Navy, we always wondered why the less glamorous Oiler ships have Indian Names compared to Destroyers and Carriers.
This reminds me when I was in the Navy, we always wondered why the less glamorous Oiler ships have Indian Names compared to Destroyers and Carriers.
CRT vs LCD - Hardware Mods - HDAdvance - Custom Controllers - Game Storage - Wii Gamecube and other Guides:
CRTGAMER Guides in Board Guides Index: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p1109425
- Jmustang1968
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?
I mean his stance had no bearing on response. I don't have any emotional investment to get angry either way. This was more of a general commentary on his postings in this thread and some others.Luke wrote:Civil: courteous and polite.Jmustang1968 wrote: I don't care about his stance. I could/couldn't care less.
My Sales Thread
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge
My Gameroom and Collection pics
Game Room Video Tour
RPGamer Previewer
Current Feedback: +266 Racketboy, +172 NintendoAge