Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
Post Reply

Change?

Change the name and logo
11
34%
Change only the name
4
13%
Change only the logo
0
No votes
No change is needed
17
53%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by Jmustang1968 »

dsheinem wrote:i just don't have the energy today :lol:

also, BurningDoom, Congress never asked that. Some select members have, but it wasn't a government action or a vote or anything.

And if the name causes personal offense to some and has demonstrable racist origins and connotations, I can't see any good arguments from anyone else to the contrary for keeping it. What value is there in keeping such a name that at least some groups have repeatedly stated is derogatory? Just because other native americans don't care or like the name, that somehow makes it no longer derogatory to the group who asked for the change?
Almost anything can cause personal offense these days. Intent goes a long way. They named these teams so in order to pay homage to a culture, not to be derogatory towards them. How can you disregard possibly an equal amount of people who want it to stay because they feel it keeps their culture relevant and gives it attention.
AppleQueso

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by AppleQueso »

Jmustang1968 wrote:
dsheinem wrote:i just don't have the energy today :lol:

also, BurningDoom, Congress never asked that. Some select members have, but it wasn't a government action or a vote or anything.

And if the name causes personal offense to some and has demonstrable racist origins and connotations, I can't see any good arguments from anyone else to the contrary for keeping it. What value is there in keeping such a name that at least some groups have repeatedly stated is derogatory? Just because other native americans don't care or like the name, that somehow makes it no longer derogatory to the group who asked for the change?
Almost anything can cause personal offense these days. Intent goes a long way. They named these teams so in order to pay homage to a culture, not to be derogatory towards them. How can you disregard possibly an equal amount of people who want it to stay because they feel it keeps their culture relevant and gives it attention.
They could just as easily use a Native American inspired name that doesn't also, you know, carry derogatory connotations.
Last edited by AppleQueso on Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by dsheinem »

I guess I've not seen anything approaching substantive support from native american groups for keeping the name as a way to honor their culture. I've seen plenty to the contrary. I'm sure many don't care. But not caring about it isn't the same as thinking it's a fantastic, noble, respectful nickname.
User avatar
samsonlonghair
Next-Gen
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Now: Newport News, VA. Formerly: Richmond. Before that: Near the WV/VA border

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by samsonlonghair »

So I keep hearing the point that some tribes don't take offense. Doesn't it matter that racism is bad no matter who you are?

I think the teams should show more respect to the indigenous people for whom they are named. Florida State has shown that you can honor a tribe instead of insulting the tribe. In 2005, Florida State successfully defended their team name. The NCAA agreed and granted them an exception.

What's preventing professional teams from showing the same respect that this college team shows?
Jmustang1968 wrote:There is also historical tradition with these team names. They were so named before rampant political correctness has taken over.
The Cleveland Indians baseball team was founded in 1894 before men of different races played in the same league. The point is that baseball has changed. Tradition is not an excuse for racism.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by Luke »

Jmustang1968 wrote: Dude you have no idea of what you are talking about. Do you post in every thread just to be apart of the conversation even when you have nothing to contribute?
Please keep it civil.
User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by Jmustang1968 »

Luke wrote:
Jmustang1968 wrote: Dude you have no idea of what you are talking about. Do you post in every thread just to be apart of the conversation even when you have nothing to contribute?
Please keep it civil.
It was civil. He was posting things that had little relevance or offering nothint with substance. I don't care about his stance. I could/couldn't care less.
User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by Jmustang1968 »

dsheinem wrote:I guess I've not seen anything approaching substantive support from native american groups for keeping the name as a way to honor their culture. I've seen plenty to the contrary. I'm sure many don't care. But not caring about it isn't the same as thinking it's a fantastic, noble, respectful nickname.
It was never said to be noble or fantastic. Thankfully that is not a requirement to become a team name.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by Luke »

Jmustang1968 wrote: I don't care about his stance. I could/couldn't care less.
Civil: courteous and polite.
User avatar
CRTGAMER
Next-Gen
Posts: 11933
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:59 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by CRTGAMER »

As much as I hate "Political Correctness" changing everything around us, I voted Yes since the label does seem derogatory to a group of people. Does not matter if it only affects a small percentage of the population if it is perceived as a racial slur.

This reminds me when I was in the Navy, we always wondered why the less glamorous Oiler ships have Indian Names compared to Destroyers and Carriers.
Image
CRT vs LCD - Hardware Mods - HDAdvance - Custom Controllers - Game Storage - Wii Gamecube and other Guides:
CRTGAMER Guides in Board Guides Index: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p1109425

Image
Image
User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Should The Redskins change their name and Logo?

Post by Jmustang1968 »

Luke wrote:
Jmustang1968 wrote: I don't care about his stance. I could/couldn't care less.
Civil: courteous and polite.
I mean his stance had no bearing on response. I don't have any emotional investment to get angry either way. This was more of a general commentary on his postings in this thread and some others.
Post Reply