harper wrote:
Only thing I really disagree with here is anything that's been said about the Genesis that doesn't imply or clearly state that it sucks.
I'm trying to be nice to the SNES, but my patience with Nintendo fans is not infinite

harper wrote:
Only thing I really disagree with here is anything that's been said about the Genesis that doesn't imply or clearly state that it sucks.
AppleQueso wrote:I like my Genesis a lot, but I grew up with SNES.
Needless to say, if I was forced to choose I'd choose SNES, no questions asked.
mas wrote:Plus the genesis games are cheaper than the snes games.
foxhound1022 wrote:Ok, what I wanna know is; why anytime there was a dual-release for these systems, the SNES port usually seemed more polished; better sound, visuals, control.
Hmmm?
harper wrote:mas wrote:Plus the genesis games are cheaper than the snes games.
Well yeah, 'cause they're not as good. You get what you pay for.
foxhound1022 wrote:Ok, what I wanna know is; why anytime there was a dual-release for these systems, the SNES port usually seemed more polished; better sound, visuals, control.
Hmmm?
irixith wrote:I guess it came down to the fact that the SNES crushed the Genesis in overall sales, and developers put more resources behind their SNES ports.