Breetai wrote:greg wrote:Now that China owns the place again, they've kept their commie hands off.

Well, to the best of my knowledge, they have left Hong Kong intact. Mainland China has been enjoying capitalism quite a lot, even though it is fake and they use what basically amounts to slave labor to make it work.
brunoafh wrote:I think it just boils down to the fact that they don't see duplicating and selling video game software as something condemnable, but instead just a quick easy way to make some money.
This is what troubles me. What is preventing them from them from understanding the concept of copyrights?
Why does China copy Japan constantly? Despite such a rich history and incredible culture and beauty, It's like China is a black hole when it comes to originality. To think that they'd use an old Japanese song for the theme to the Shanghai Expo is just crazy. Do they think nobody would notice? I find it hard to believe that China is incapable of coming up with its own unique stuff for everyone to love and share with the world.
Anyhow, back to the topic, I'm curious who was responsible for the Sapphire bootlegs. I wonder if it was a Japanese effort rather than a Chinese effort. In any case, I found
a website that goes into detail about the bootlegs. I've never seen this website before, so it's worth a look. Again, since Sapphire was a limited release game and Hudson won't make any further money from it (at least not the PC Engine version), if whoever is responsible for the bootlegs would've just said from the beginning, "Hey, these are not the originals, but here you go, please buy one for about $20," I don't find that offensive really at all and I'd buy one. But when they pass them off as originals and trick people into paying $600 or whatever for them, that's just wrong.