RCBH928 wrote:
The original or the sequel? I never played the original and wonder how it holds up?
The original StarCraft. I think it holds up pretty well. I'm not too knowledgeable about Real Time Strategy games; StarCraft and Empire Earth II are the only ones I remember beating. I've played StarCraft (obviously), the Star Wars RTSes, WarHammer 40K Dawn of War, Rome: Total War, a freeware game called Trash, Age of Mythology, and maybe a couple others I don't recall. With that laid out, I say that StarCraft is a killer RTS.
MrPopo wrote:Well, the plot in the games is like someone read the Cliff's Notes of the Cliff's Notes and then picked a few points from that and built a game around it fleshing things out with their own ideas. The story in 2000 is incredibly weak; C&C this is not.
Well fuck, I won't worry about the plot then. Thanks for clearing that up.
EDIT: I suppose that's understandable since the book is pretty long, political, and very dense.