Well I always wanted to get stoned, I guessdsheinem wrote:
I'd rather watch the 1987 version, honest
Well I always wanted to get stoned, I guessdsheinem wrote:
Xeogred wrote:The obvious answer is that it's time for the Dreamcast 2.


My kind of movieHobie-wan wrote: Interstallar. Gravity stretches things a bit, but it is not based on hypotheticals. Both were good, but IMHO Gravity was a "watch it once and you're done" type of movie.
In short: Kinda sorta. It wasn't his project, but one he was interested in.Ack wrote:Didn't Pixels start life as a Jack Black project? I seem to remember him a few years ago saying he was doing a movie with a very similar plot...
I agree that it wasn't up to the standard of the original, but I think too many folks are unable to take the movie on its own merits because of that latent comparison. I mean, what made the original Robocop was lots of splatter and lots of social/political satire. The new one isn't as splatterific, or satirical at all, but it does still try to be a political criticism, and I actually think it does OK, even though it definitely changes the tone. And I still think it's an OK movie.Luke wrote: Agreed. They took out what made Robocop, Robocop.
And the special effects were actually so much better in the original. That scene in the new one where Robocop is basically a face and a lung was the worst.
Story sucks, cgi sucks, characters suck...Fuck the Robocop reboot up it's robotic ass. Just as stupid and not fun as the Total Recall remake. And while I'm on a roll, fuck video game companies for not giving us enough Robocop games.

RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
My thoughts exactly. That "Anthology of Interest II" episode of Futurama carried this exact premise much better more than a decade ago.Luke wrote:And fuck all...PIXELS at one point in time had a great script and now we're getting GROWN UPS THREE, PLUS VIDEO GAME CLICHE'S. I hate, hate to judge a movie by a trailer, but nothing about it was funny, clever, and no joke had any payoff. "It's Donkey Kong" isn't a joke. You're just showing us something.
"It's Pac-Man!". Okay. What's the joke? Spoiler alert, the joke is that there are cars named after the ghosts from the game. Ho ho ho. Pac-Man also chomps his creator. Ho ho ho. It's "we show you shit" humor. I also have a strong feeling Rob Schneider will be in this toilet bowl of a movie and I wouldn't be surprised if the movie contains at least a dozen fart jokes.
Way to screw up a pretty neat premise.
I'm done. For now.
In all fairness, when you make a movie starring Robocop and the title of the movie is Robocop, people will compare it to the movie Robocop.marurun wrote: I agree that it wasn't up to the standard of the original, but I think too many folks are unable to take the movie on its own merits because of that latent comparison. .
$,$$$,$$$ is my guess.samsonlonghair wrote:Why is Adam Sandler so intent on making bad movies?