PC build thread
Re: PC build thread
Because I have EVERY game installed all at once. I don't want just the OS to gain the speed boost; I want my games to load faster too. It takes up about 1.5 TB on my HDD. Then I've got another HDD that's for media; videos, music, etc.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Re: PC build thread
As an eventuality, that'd be nice. However, in the meantime, I think it's pretty illogical. It's making an all-or-nothing situation where there isn't one.
Why not enjoy SSD performance outside of games for the time being, and aim to eventually replace your game HDD(s) with them as costs come down?
It's a moving target too. I swapped my (full) 1.5TB game install drive out for a 3TB one a couple weeks ago, because I like to keep things installed too.
Feels like a problem where the solution is always going to be juuust around the corner.
Why not enjoy SSD performance outside of games for the time being, and aim to eventually replace your game HDD(s) with them as costs come down?
It's a moving target too. I swapped my (full) 1.5TB game install drive out for a 3TB one a couple weeks ago, because I like to keep things installed too.
Re: PC build thread
All I use this machine for is videos, internet, and games. I don't turn it off at night so the Windows boot performance isn't worth the massive hassle of getting a new system drive, getting all the shortcuts rejiggered, and all the rest, especially with the Hiberboot feature of Windows 8 that already makes boot much faster than in the past.isiolia wrote:Why not enjoy SSD performance outside of games for the time being, and aim to eventually replace your game HDD(s) with them as costs come down?
The SSD size has been increasing at a much faster rate than my storage utilization. So I can wait for the two lines to intersect.It's a moving target too. I swapped my (full) 1.5TB game install drive out for a 3TB one a couple weeks ago, because I like to keep things installed too.Feels like a problem where the solution is always going to be juuust around the corner.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Re: PC build thread
Consider one of those hybrid drives that uses all sorts of caching and pre-caching algorithms. That way you get the cheaper magnetic storage and the advantage of a flash boost.
Also, while the seek rate is much better on SSDs, I think a traditional hard drive will continue to take the case for raw data rate.
Also, while the seek rate is much better on SSDs, I think a traditional hard drive will continue to take the case for raw data rate.
- Cronozilla
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:15 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA.
Re: PC build thread
<~ *Sees the tree ... decides not to bark up it*
- Hobie-wan
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 21705
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
- Contact:
Re: PC build thread
But I swear I saw a squirrel up there!Cronozilla wrote:<~ *Sees the tree ... decides not to bark up it*
I've never met a pun I didn't like. - Stark
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
Re: PC build thread
While I think that still rung true a few years ago, at least at the top end of HDD performance (15k RPM drives and the like), modern SSDs are significantly faster. A WD Velociraptor can push around 200MB/sec sequential reads, where modern SATA connected SSDs can do around 500MB/sec, and that has more to do with the limitations of SATA than anything else. PCIe SSDs peak a lot higher.marurun wrote: Also, while the seek rate is much better on SSDs, I think a traditional hard drive will continue to take the case for raw data rate.
Re: PC build thread
Awesome! I seemed to remember that physical HDs had better sustained read rates at the high end even just a couple or 3 years ago, but I was so priced out of the SSD market at the time I stopped paying as much attention. I'm really glad SSDs have improved their performance so much while bringing the prices down, because now I can consider adding one when I finally get around to building a new rig.isiolia wrote:While I think that still rung true a few years ago, at least at the top end of HDD performance (15k RPM drives and the like), modern SSDs are significantly faster. A WD Velociraptor can push around 200MB/sec sequential reads, where modern SATA connected SSDs can do around 500MB/sec, and that has more to do with the limitations of SATA than anything else. PCIe SSDs peak a lot higher.marurun wrote: Also, while the seek rate is much better on SSDs, I think a traditional hard drive will continue to take the case for raw data rate.
Re: PC build thread
MrPopo wrote:Because I have EVERY game installed all at once. I don't want just the OS to gain the speed boost; I want my games to load faster too. It takes up about 1.5 TB on my HDD. Then I've got another HDD that's for media; videos, music, etc.
Yup, that's basically how I think about it. I've got a 2TB HDD and that ones already about 75-80% full, so I'll be looking into getting another drive soon. I plan on getting another 2 or 3 TB one, because the space is more important than the speed for me when the price of getting that speed is so high.MrPopo wrote:The SSD size has been increasing at a much faster rate than my storage utilization. So I can wait for the two lines to intersect.
I feel old when talking to anyone my age yet too inexperienced to effectively talk to anyone older. Life is grand that way.
My twitter handle is @EckoExplores
My twitter handle is @EckoExplores
- noiseredux
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 38148
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
- Contact:

