Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii
superlarz
128-bit
Posts: 770
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by superlarz »

you should play through them older ---> newer. you will better appreciate the refinement that occurred through the years
owned: Atari VCS, Intellivision, ColecoVision, NES, NES2, Sega Master System, Turbografx-16, Genesis/Sega CD Model 1, Genesis/Sega CD Model 2/32x, SNES, Atari Jaguar, Virtual Boy, GBA, 3DO, Saturn, Playstation, PSone, N64, Dreamcast, PS2, Gamecube, Xbox, PSP, Xbox 360, Wii, PS3
wanted: Cd-I, Neo Geo AES
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by MrPopo »

OoT had the incredibly innovative concept of Z-targeting. In one go they came up with a control method that let the game be fun and have strategy but still have full 3D movement. As mentioned, TP is OoT advance.

And as mentioned, LttP is the greatest of the Zeldas.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
glynnahab
128-bit
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by glynnahab »

MrPopo wrote:And as mentioned, LttP is the greatest of the Zeldas.
I would like to contribute to this conversation by agreeing with everyone else about this.
kingmohd84 wrote:I really won't buy a console with hair,
u never know where that hair came from
User avatar
corn619
Next-Gen
Posts: 2270
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by corn619 »

superlarz wrote:you should play through them older ---> newer. you will better appreciate the refinement that occurred through the years
You make a good point. If your intersted in the evolution of the Zelda series that is the way to go.
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by Ack »

On a funny note, since everyone is concurring with me I figure I should say that I know a couple folks who consider the original on the NES the best. I figure we ought to show it some love.
Image
User avatar
elvis
128-bit
Posts: 910
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:20 am
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by elvis »

Ack wrote:I know a couple folks who consider the original on the NES the best.
It's definitely the hardest of the lot (in terms of "getting hit and dying", as opposed to "puzzles and time limits" which probably belongs to Majora's Mask). Definitely no kid gloves with that game.
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by MrPopo »

I remember once I was bored at work and looked at the maps for the second quest. I never got past the second dungeon as a kid (ran out of bombs and switched to Mega Man 2), but looking at some of the later dungeons... they are just pure sadism. A lot of one way warps and rooms full of blue darknuts. But one day I shall conquer it.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
MaliceValentine
32-bit
Posts: 272
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Contact:

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by MaliceValentine »

Pfffft IMO Majora's Mask passes Oot Time by a Longshot defintly play Majoras Mask after Oot not to say that Oot wasnt awsome but MM had a lot more to it =D
superlarz
128-bit
Posts: 770
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by superlarz »

As I said before, play them in order. If you want to play the 2-d games, start with the original, and then move on to A Link to the Past (skipping Zelda 2, which is much different and pretty hardcore.) If you are only interested in the 3-D Zeldas, as you probably are, Play Ocarina, then Majora's Mask if you can get a copy... Then Twilight Princess. If you have the need to play Windwaker, go for it, its a cool game, just much different. I feel like you could probably play that one at any time though, if playing the other games starts feeling monotonous.
owned: Atari VCS, Intellivision, ColecoVision, NES, NES2, Sega Master System, Turbografx-16, Genesis/Sega CD Model 1, Genesis/Sega CD Model 2/32x, SNES, Atari Jaguar, Virtual Boy, GBA, 3DO, Saturn, Playstation, PSone, N64, Dreamcast, PS2, Gamecube, Xbox, PSP, Xbox 360, Wii, PS3
wanted: Cd-I, Neo Geo AES
User avatar
SpaceBooger
Moderator
Posts: 4420
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:40 am
Location: The AK-Rowdy
Contact:

Re: Ocarina or Twilight Princess?

Post by SpaceBooger »

the first Zelda game I ever beat was the Adventure of Link, followed my the original and the Link's Awakening.
I never finished Link to the Past, I own the player choice one, but don't have a working SNES... so one day Ill finish it.
So no I am not just wanting to play the 3d ones, but I have Ocarina and Twilight Princess to borrow and I decided that I will just play them in chronological order skipping Wind Waker, since I own it and can play it anytime.
BLOG | BST
Systems Owned: Atari 2600 & 5200, NES, Game Boy (OG, Pocket, Color, GBA & GBA SP), DSi, 3DS, SMS, Genesis, Sega CD,
Nomad, SNES, Saturn, PS1, Dreamcast, XBox, PS2, Gamecube, Nintendo DS, Wii, PSP, PS3, WiiU, XBOX, 360 XBONE & Switch.
Post Reply