NFL 2014 Thread

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by Jmustang1968 »

Luke wrote:
dsheinem wrote: don't try to tell me shit about pretzels, reb. I'm from Pennsylvania.
Can't really argue with that.

But if we start throwing around insults about hot dogs...aww man are you in for a beatin'.

I's be name dropping. Not only do I know an NFL QB (well, retired/fired/who knows NFL QB) he's married to one of my best friend's Sister (who was also in athletics).

"Mid Twenties man..you take your time, you add stats, you impress schools and go for an extra four years by any means... Age is a factor, but scouts and agents forget age when it equals in experience and numbers. Unless you a running back or receiver (and this guy worked with a potential HOFer). Dem folks might not even see guaranteed money. Most of my opponents are close to 30 and all have kids. A Masters degree in commun-i-ca-caytions is still another four years on the roster, and a better lead in to get a job in the NFL"


I swear to God herself he said "communi-i-ca-caytions".
The wrench in your theory is that these guys have been tracked since high school. Many guys commit to the big schools in 9th and 10th grade now. You cant just magically create extra years in there.
User avatar
Blu
Next-Gen
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:09 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by Blu »

lolJohnnyManziel. Enjoy your tenure on the Browns.
catnip
128-bit
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:49 pm
Location: Vermont
Contact:

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by catnip »

woot woot, Jerrah didn't go for the shiny!

That said, we need defensive upgrades, STAT. My vote is bolster the defensive line. It'd be good to have a safety, but hey, if the quarterback gets rushed, the secondary has to work way less hard.
Final Fantasy IX is the best one
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by dsheinem »

As happy as I am to basically ignore the NFL between February and September, I am also very happy that the season is starting again this week!

And, FWIW, I may have a spot or two left in a straight Pick 'Em league if you are interested. It's $35 for the year and I'd prefer to only include people I am friendly with...so if you fit both of those criteria and want to get in let me know via PM :)
User avatar
DonSilvestre
32-bit
Posts: 246
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:02 pm
Location: Mad Town

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by DonSilvestre »

Packers. Super Bowl. Time to annihilate Carroll and Seahags in their own building. I'm jacked out of my mind for Thursday night :-)
"Let's attack aggressively." - Sully | The Don's Mancave
User avatar
jvalentine98
64-bit
Posts: 395
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:55 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by jvalentine98 »

NFL has gotten so pansy with all the penalties, I can't even watch it anymore. They care more about brand and image (I.E. $$$) than they do the game.

It's pretty clear the refs are instructed to protect QBs and WRs and the running game has been almost taken out of the game.
They have escaped into the mansion where they thought it was safe, yet.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by Luke »

Eleven tackles and three sacks. Sounds quite productive, no?

Maybe the F in NFL doesn't stand for "Fun" anymore. Some of you will pick up what I'm putting down.
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by dsheinem »

Luke wrote:Eleven tackles and three sacks. Sounds quite productive, no?

Maybe the F in NFL doesn't stand for "Fun" anymore. Some of you will pick up what I'm putting down.
You don't buy that it was a football decision?
User avatar
Jmustang1968
Next-Gen
Posts: 6530
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by Jmustang1968 »

dsheinem wrote:
Luke wrote:Eleven tackles and three sacks. Sounds quite productive, no?

Maybe the F in NFL doesn't stand for "Fun" anymore. Some of you will pick up what I'm putting down.
You don't buy that it was a football decision?
And that he was mostly going up against other guys who are backups or didnt make the roster. Rams are loaded on the dline and he wouldnt produce on special teams.

He was also going to do that Oprah documentary without consulting which rubbed them thr wrong way.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: NFL 2014 Thread

Post by Luke »

dsheinem wrote:and
You don't buy that it was a football decision?
I'm not well informed enough to judge, as I even have yet to read the finger pointing article about ESPN, but Sam was a stand out performer.

Sure, the spotlight was on him, but the spotlight was on him.

Pure speculation right now, but it just seems fishy. I know that it's not always about talent, it's about getting ais. Lord knows Romo only has a job because of his fan base. So why not Sam, who is a character, and is actually good at what he does? Dude should be a shoe in for a multi million dollar contract.

I'm numbers oriented, so when see his stats all I can think is "How?". How is this beast not signed? He's like a fit and young Julius Peppers.
Post Reply