Mass Effect

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
Post Reply
masonyes
24-bit
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:29 am

Mass Effect

Post by masonyes »

I was wondering what are the lowest system specs that any of you have played Mass Effect on?
My cpu and ram are fine, however my video-card is out-dated.

Here are my specs
Pentium 4 3 Gigahertz
1 gig of ram
radeon 9800xt 256 megabytes!!
You know that story, about how NASA spent millions of dollars developing this pen that writes in Zero G? Did you ever read that?
You know how the Russians solved the problem?
They used a pencil.
User avatar
deathclaw
64-bit
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:15 am
Location: Slovakia /Europe/

Re: Mass Effect

Post by deathclaw »

I've got no signature.
User avatar
Doc
8-bit
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:27 pm
Location: London, England

Re: Mass Effect

Post by Doc »

Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: Mass Effect

Post by Pulsar_t »

http://masseffect.bioware.com/forums/vi ... &forum=125

You'll need a Pixel Shader 3 compliant GPU (Geforce 6+, Radeon X1000+) to run ME and most other games using the Unreal 3 Engine. I also found that you'll need DDR3 memory (Video RAM, that is) for UE3 games to load textures fast enough, otherwise you'll get a lot of pop-in texture artifacts like those witnessed in the 360 version.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
masonyes
24-bit
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:29 am

Re: Mass Effect

Post by masonyes »

I read that article about pixel shader 3, what about 3d analyze. Isn't it possible to emulate 3.0.

I can borrow the game, so I my as well try it and I'll let you guys know lol.
You know that story, about how NASA spent millions of dollars developing this pen that writes in Zero G? Did you ever read that?
You know how the Russians solved the problem?
They used a pencil.
User avatar
PharmaceuticalCowboy
64-bit
Posts: 463
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Mass Effect

Post by PharmaceuticalCowboy »

9800xt has pixel shader 3.0 support. I say get at least another gig of RAM and you'll be good to go. Also, DDR3 RAM is presently slower than DDR2.
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: Mass Effect

Post by Pulsar_t »

PS 3.0 wasn't even around in 2003 when the 9800XT was released (it's not even 100% DirectX 9b compliant afaik).. unless ATI supports it through a trick in their drivers.

And care to explain how DDR3 is slower than DDR2? :mrgreen:
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
User avatar
PharmaceuticalCowboy
64-bit
Posts: 463
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Mass Effect

Post by PharmaceuticalCowboy »

Pulsar_t wrote:PS 3.0 wasn't even around in 2003 when the 9800XT was released (it's not even 100% DirectX 9b compliant afaik).. unless ATI supports it through a trick in their drivers.

And care to explain how DDR3 is slower than DDR2? :mrgreen:
You're right on both accounts, for some reason I thought I only needed a step up from my 9600xt to get that, I almost got a hacked version of Bioshock to work, so that's what I'm thinking of. Also, when DDR3 came out it was slower, but had a wider bandwidth, I see now that it is about twice as fast as DDR2... wonder why most people are still using DDR2 for system RAM then?
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Re: Mass Effect

Post by Niode »

Because it's cheaper. You can get more ddr2 for the same price as ddr3.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
Post Reply