Wii-U thoughts so far

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii

Wii-U

I'm in for one
120
43%
Maybe later
96
35%
Not interested
45
16%
Undecided
16
6%
 
Total votes: 277

dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by dsheinem »

pepharytheworm wrote: So, basically no new ideas, but perceived new ideas because of greater graphical capabilities.
Which = sales
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24201
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by MrPopo »

dsheinem wrote:
pepharytheworm wrote: So, basically no new ideas, but perceived new ideas because of greater graphical capabilities.
Which = sales
I'd like to see a game that uses massive draw distances to simulate real sniping (complete with needing to understand ballistics). Unfortunately, that paints a massive target for every watchdog group to use the word "murder simulator".
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by ZeroAX »

MrPopo wrote: I'd like to see a game that uses massive draw distances to simulate real sniping (complete with needing to understand ballistics). Unfortunately, that paints a massive target for every watchdog group to use the word "murder simulator".
No it paints a massive target for whiny skill-less gamers who "own at cod" but can't play this "stupid broken game".

though to be honest realistic weapon handling just wouldn't be fun for everyone
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24201
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by MrPopo »

ZeroAX wrote:though to be honest realistic weapon handling just wouldn't be fun for everyone
I agree, but I don't see that as a bad thing. Not everything should be fun for everyone, and there should be games that cater to the various interests out there.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by ZeroAX »

MrPopo wrote:
ZeroAX wrote:though to be honest realistic weapon handling just wouldn't be fun for everyone
I agree, but I don't see that as a bad thing. Not everything should be fun for everyone, and there should be games that cater to the various interests out there.
oh I completely agree. I know I won't enjoy realistic shooting, but there's probably a VERY strong niche for that.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
Xeogred
Next-Gen
Posts: 14387
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: KC

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Xeogred »

CavZee wrote:"Nintendo gonna Nintendo" for better AND for worse.
Exactly.

Spoilers, they aren't going anywhere.

If they were about to go under, they could double up the Pokemon schedule by releasing 4 games at once and everyone would buy them and the handhelds will start printing literal gold bricks.
Image
HLTB | PSN Trophies | RFG (WIP)
User avatar
darsparx
Next-Gen
Posts: 4394
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:24 pm

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by darsparx »

I'd hope not, that's one series it feels like they haven't played it fully safe with lately. There's generally something different and supposedly "better' with every pokemon entry and it keeps it interesting. The biggest issue they have is that they are playing it safe with mario, and donkey kong and not really even utilizing starfox as much as they could to draw some more people in. They could honestly do some things to really experiment and try to draw some people back. Or even come up with a new IP to experiment with. Of course I still really want to see nintendo finally get someone to make a spiritual sequel to dk64...(but that's a dream that will never come true it seems)
My gameroom
My systems: NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii, original gba, gba sp(001), ds lite, 3ds, vita, psp, PSone(101 model) ps2, ps3(320gb model), ps4, retron 5, and Dreamcast.
Image
bogusmeatfactory wrote:Ever feel like a wild gazelle in the wilderness?
User avatar
Retrogamer0001
Next-Gen
Posts: 1665
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:56 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Retrogamer0001 »

MrPopo wrote:I'd like to see a game that uses massive draw distances to simulate real sniping (complete with needing to understand ballistics). Unfortunately, that paints a massive target for every watchdog group to use the word "murder simulator".
Sniper_Elite.jpeg
Sniper_Elite.jpeg (34.4 KiB) Viewed 728 times
Though as far as huge draw distances go, the new versions are probably a better choice...
Image

The game room - > http://racketboy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=45478

"We're on an express elevator to hell - goin' down!"
User avatar
RCBH928
Next-Gen
Posts: 6082
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:40 am

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by RCBH928 »

AppleQueso wrote:
CavZee wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:
Doesn't help that Nintendo own franchises have been growing rather sterile as they've started really milking that nostalgia well dry. They still make high quality software, but it's hard to explain to someone why they should pick up the newest installments in these various franchises when all you can say is that "it's still really good."

It all feels very "safe," which wouldn't be THAT huge a problem if not for the fact that thanks to these sales slumps, we don't really have very much in the way of interesting 3rd party games to pick up the slack.
Couldn't the same be said about most of the industry? The AAA market is stagnating and budgets are getting astronomical so risk taking and new ideas arent going to be as prevalent as in the many years past. The gaming industry is so focused and built around mega franchises and sequels more so than even Hollywood.
Eh, maybe, but even if that's the case it makes Nintendo's adherence to that formula even more puzzling, because they haven't exactly followed the rest of the industry in anything else they've been doing.
I am sorry, the other 2 companies got some new IPs and they did take a risk. L.A. Noir , Gears of War, Uncharted, Last of Us, Demon's Soul...etc all new IPs that show that there was risk taking in making new different games with different formulas. They didn't do "The New Crash Bandicoot Levels" or "Halo 1 HD remake" and expect it to be a system seller. There were some new IPs going on for the Wii like MadWorld and The Conduit but how successful was that?
User avatar
Reprise
Next-Gen
Posts: 4823
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:27 am
Location: Earth

Re: Wii-U thoughts so far

Post by Reprise »

dsheinem wrote: The "PS4 and Xbox One have no games" argument was barely true at launch, nor is it true six months later.
But the "Wii U has no games" argument was, equally, barely true at launch, nor is it true now.
Own: Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, Playstation 1, Playstation 2, Playstation 3, Playstation 4, Playstation 5, PS Vita, Super Nintendo, Nintendo 64, Gamecube, Wii U, Game Boy Advance, DS, 3DS, Switch, Switch 2, Xbox, Xbox 360
Post Reply