Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
Frag Mortuus
Next-Gen
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Princeton, WV

Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by Frag Mortuus »

http://www.destructoid.com/fallout-4-mi ... 5740.phtml

I hope this is true. I beat the hell out of Fall Out 3.
noiseredux wrote:Frag Mortuus rules.
Image

Sell/Trade/Want List
User avatar
Sano
Next-Gen
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by Sano »

Ooo Fallout 4! As long as it isn't crappy like New Vegas was (just my opinion...).
Image
Frag Mortuus
Next-Gen
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Princeton, WV

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by Frag Mortuus »

Sano wrote:Ooo Fallout 4! As long as it isn't crappy like New Vegas was (just my opinion...).
I own, but haven't played FNV. What made it so bad?
noiseredux wrote:Frag Mortuus rules.
Image

Sell/Trade/Want List
User avatar
Xeogred
Next-Gen
Posts: 14387
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: KC

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by Xeogred »

It's so funny how conflicted people are over Fallout 3 and NV.

For myself, I personally think NV blows F3 completely out of the water, along with all the other Bethesda developed stuff too.

The dialogue/writing is about 200x better. Obsidian could write up a story about dog doodoo and it'd be interesting.

Real factions, real choices that actually have an impact on the game. It's completely neutral just like Obsidian's other stuff, no clear good or evil.

The engine still sucks either way you cut it, but the towns were better in NV too I thought. The level design for most of the towns in F3 was just terrible.

No lame endless train tunnels too.

If you're doing console versions or no mods on the PC... NV re-used a lot of music from Fallout 1-2 and it takes it up 99 levels. I ended up using some mod for F3 that put in all the classic music and it's just hilarious how much better it made it for me. They should just really consider getting Mark Morgan back for 4 if possible.

The best of both games combined would be perfect. At times I really did like how F3 was more combat oriented, the big city area was pretty neat, and the main plot was potentially more interesting than NV's, but the writing is just terribad and boring. I felt the same with Skyrim after awhile and it just kills the immersion for me. That said the gameplay rocked and if Bethesda are doing F4 themselves it'd still be awesome, but it'd probably leave a bigger mark for me if Obsidian gets to do another. Either way Skyrim looked and played/felt amazing, so I can't wait to see what happens with Fallout in a better engine since I'm always a bigger fan for sci-fi.
Image
HLTB | PSN Trophies | RFG (WIP)
manowarjoe
8-bit
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:37 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by manowarjoe »

Can't wait!
ninjainspandex
Next-Gen
Posts: 4574
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: Hartland Wisconsin

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by ninjainspandex »

Glad I waited on buying a PS4 because this is the game I want to buy the console with.
Image
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by isiolia »

Frag Mortuus wrote:
Sano wrote:Ooo Fallout 4! As long as it isn't crappy like New Vegas was (just my opinion...).
I own, but haven't played FNV. What made it so bad?
I thought NV was great in general. Main thing I didn't like was that the plot pretty much funnels you into a handful of ending options.
User avatar
marurun
Moderator
Posts: 12406
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by marurun »

The writing in FNV was much better than 3, but at the higher levels enemies take too long to kill and do too much damage. Doesn't so much make the game harder as generally more frustrating.
User avatar
Xeogred
Next-Gen
Posts: 14387
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: KC

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by Xeogred »

marurun wrote:The writing in FNV was much better than 3, but at the higher levels enemies take too long to kill and do too much damage. Doesn't so much make the game harder as generally more frustrating.
I only noticed that with the DeathClaw myself, which you could easily ignore for the most part if you avoided that area. But yeah.
Image
HLTB | PSN Trophies | RFG (WIP)
User avatar
marurun
Moderator
Posts: 12406
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Fallout 4 May Be Revealed Next Month

Post by marurun »

Xeogred wrote:
marurun wrote:The writing in FNV was much better than 3, but at the higher levels enemies take too long to kill and do too much damage. Doesn't so much make the game harder as generally more frustrating.
I only noticed that with the DeathClaw myself, which you could easily ignore for the most part if you avoided that area. But yeah.
I noticed it most on some of the DLC missions. There's one where you are fighting this tribe of folks who are, ostensibly, human, not mutant or monster. But you CANNOT take them out even with a critical headshot. I'm sorry, I know enemies need to be "harder" at higher levels, but making a human character impossible to take down without many many attacks, even to the head, is just silly.

That said, NV really had MUCH better aiming mechanics. I found it hard to play Fallout 3 without using AP because my aim always seemed off. NV fixes that, and I was much more able to play without relying on AP. Using a sniper rifle or other very long range weapon is useless with AP in either game, but in Fallout 3 the aiming issues made most long-range combat pointless. In NV long-range is finally an option.
Post Reply