Why does stardom fade?

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
AppleQueso

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by AppleQueso »

RCBH928 wrote: 3) For people who are arguing that Adam Sandler is making money. There is a difference between making money and making quality . According to wikipedia, The Shawshank Redemption merely made profit , yet its ranked #1 in top 250 films on IMDB. Justin Bieber is probably making big bucks but I do not see people recognize him as an added talent to the music industry.
After this bit I'm just flat out confused. If by "stardom" you mean something other than "making money and being popular" then what exactly do you mean? :|
User avatar
BogusMeatFactory
Next-Gen
Posts: 6770
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:16 pm
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Contact:

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by BogusMeatFactory »

RCBH928 wrote: 2)I was not exactly discussing if Ben Affleck was going down or up in his career, but I was trying to give examples. Maybe this particular actor is picking up again. I do not rate quality with the Oscars any more, I just can't put Argo and Slumdog millionaire with Gone With The Wind and The Godfather. I am sorry.
Ben Affleck isn't just picking up, he has skyrocketed as a great director and a very good actor. Even before Argo, it was the Town and before that was Gone Baby Gone. You are right, you can't put these movies in with Gone with the Wind and the Godfather, because movies have changed, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. No one is trying to say one thing is better than another. That is just like saying one generation of gaming is clearly better than another, or an era of paintings are better than another.
RCBH928 wrote: 3) For people who are arguing that Adam Sandler is making money. There is a difference between making money and making quality . According to wikipedia, The Shawshank Redemption merely made profit , yet its ranked #1 in top 250 films on IMDB. Justin Bieber is probably making big bucks but I do not see people recognize him as an added talent to the music industry.
Yes there is a difference between making money and making quality, but you are missing out the third element and that is popularity. Guess what? Adam Sandler is popular. Should that be the case? For me, no, but for the rest of the world, they have decided so. With Justin Bieber, he wins awards, he has millions of adoring fans and he is batshit crazy.
RCBH928 wrote: The fact that some actors/musicians were on top then faded away, while others continue on top over the decades of their career, makes me think that there is some sort of hollywood politics in the sense that if they like you they will shoot you to the stars, and if they started unlike you you will be a forgotten memory.

Of course, this is only my interpretation of the topic, it can be right or wrong.
There are politics in Hollywood. You can burn so bright that you burn all your bridges. Like I stated previously in the thread with Jim Carrey, he had some very erratic and destructive behavior in films like the Number 23 by urinating on set. In other films like Fun With Dick and Jane, he would yell at the director for giving him direction. That sort of behavior can make the big studios not want to work with you.

You would think Jamie Foxx would have a better career after Ray, but that guy is a complete diva and guess what? He doesn't get many films.

What do you think happened to Joaquin Phoenix with his Andy Kauffman-esque stunt that was the film, "I'm Still Here." It was a big joke that killed his career.
Ack wrote:I don't know, chief, the haunting feeling of lust I feel whenever I look at your avatar makes me think it's real.
-I am the idiot that likes to have fun and be happy.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by Luke »

AppleQueso wrote:
Which part are you lying about? :o
I'm being honest when I say I think Truman is unfunny, pointless, and a waste of time. It's nearly two hours of "I GET IT! HE'S BEING FILMED! DO SOMETHING INTERESTING WITH THE CONCEPT!"

Ben went from PEARL HARBOR to directing ARGO. That's like going from Milwaukee's Best Light to Sam Adams Oktoberfest.
AppleQueso

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by AppleQueso »

Luke wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:
Which part are you lying about? :o
I'm being honest when I say I think Truman is unfunny, pointless, and a waste of time. It's nearly two hours of "I GET IT! HE'S BEING FILMED! DO SOMETHING INTERESTING WITH THE CONCEPT!"
I don't think it's supposed to be funny...
User avatar
BogusMeatFactory
Next-Gen
Posts: 6770
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:16 pm
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Contact:

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by BogusMeatFactory »

AppleQueso wrote:
Luke wrote: I'm being honest when I say I think Truman is unfunny, pointless, and a waste of time. It's nearly two hours of "I GET IT! HE'S BEING FILMED! DO SOMETHING INTERESTING WITH THE CONCEPT!"
I don't think it's supposed to be funny...
I think the big problem with the film was that it had a point that it relied solely on and little else. It was a commentary on society, control and the role media has in all of that. The issues arise when little really happens, instead it just keeps pressing the same point ad nauseum until the end. It doesn't follow the traditional method of storytelling and has an inconsistant flow.

I like the film and what it was trying to say, but it really did fall flat in its presentation.
Ack wrote:I don't know, chief, the haunting feeling of lust I feel whenever I look at your avatar makes me think it's real.
-I am the idiot that likes to have fun and be happy.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by Luke »

AppleQueso wrote: I don't think it's supposed to be funny...
Then it shouldn't be labeled as a comedy. It tries to be funny, but fails.

Critics love Truman, but to me it was only a movie about a guy getting filmed doing stuff. It failed at being funny, failed at being thought provoking, and failed at being interesting or entertaining. The concept is great, but to me they failed to do anything with it.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by Luke »

BogusMeatFactory wrote: I think the big problem with the film was that it had a point that it relied solely on and little else. It was a commentary on society, control and the role media has in all of that. The issues arise when little really happens, instead it just keeps pressing the same point ad nauseum until the end. It doesn't follow the traditional method of storytelling and has an inconsistant flow.

I like the film and what it was trying to say, but it really did fall flat in its presentation.
Agreed.
AppleQueso

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by AppleQueso »

*shrug*

Fair enough I guess.
User avatar
BoneSnapDeez
Next-Gen
Posts: 20148
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 1:08 pm
Location: Maine

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by BoneSnapDeez »

Jim Carrey is humorous. I really like the Ace Ventura films and Liar Liar.

Adam Sandler is just grating and irritating. His movies are unfunny and he always seems to play abrasive self-centered man-children. It's dumb.

Can't believe I'm even commenting in this thread. I generally don't give two poops about famous people.
User avatar
KDub
Next-Gen
Posts: 1646
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:47 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO
Contact:

Re: Why does stardom fade?

Post by KDub »

Luke wrote:
KDub wrote: Adam Sandler:
Terrible actor in all honesty. He made some really funny movies for a bit then began churning out trash. He was a phase
Thirty (closer to forty) years in Hollywood is a phase? He is, and will remain one of the highest paid actors of this decade. Happy Madison, his production company, is still making bank with new projects, dvd sales, syndicated movies, etc.

The man is a Mogul, not a phase. He was on the Cosby Show when he was a kid, on MTV in his teens, on SNL and dropping award winning albums while becoming an adult, and has consistently put out movies (some of them terrible) from 1996 to 2016. That's like saying Tom Cruise "was just a phase".

Sandler is still a powerhouse in Hollywood. The duder makes money hand over fist, and will continue to do so until he calls it quits.
Yeah I call it a phase and I stick by it. Happy Madison movies have been bombing and getting god awful ratings, it wouldn't surprise me if he is making money still; but hand over fist? People don't go to see Sandler movies anymore, he has tried to regain that popularity from the period of Happy Gilmore, Billy Madison etc but even with more serious roles the movie just kinda flatlines. Being around doesn't mean his stardom is still on the same level and most people now cringe at Adam Sandler movies. That period of Sandler being the #1 funny guy in Hollywood was a complete phase, people got pretty sick of him.
Post Reply