oxymoron wrote: Either way he's wrong.
At least I'm not trying to diss retro games.Spoken like a true expert after collecting retro games for 1½ months
oxymoron wrote: Either way he's wrong.
At least I'm not trying to diss retro games.Spoken like a true expert after collecting retro games for 1½ months
Don't forget that a lot of computer games of that era were also really long and impossible to get through without saving (in this case onto disk).Gunstar Green wrote: Even still there were a lot of games that were brutally long without saves. I've done a lot of overnight pausing in my time.
What the hell?oxymoron wrote:@Menegrothx
Why are you trying to justify that modern games are the Aryan race?
oxymoron wrote: At least I'm not trying to diss retro games.
oxymoron wrote:He's pining retro and modern games and trying to justify that modern games are the better of the two.
retro games for the most part have a much higher cost/hours of gameplay ratio than modern games
For a native speaker, you sure have problem grasping the English language. If there's one thing I've made abundantly clear during my stay on this forum, it's that I hate modern gaming and love the 1990s.I never claimed them to be better, just that you're getting more content and length for your money
A word of advice: want to get rid of depression? Don't touch that junk, it'll only mess up your brain chemistry further (and cost you a lot of money in the process). Proper diet and exercise are the way to go.GirlGamer55 wrote:So I can't see a shrink and figure out what anti depressants I need