Gamerforlife wrote:Where's the option for, "there should be an equal number of each"
How are you going to get an equal number of each in the first place? By increasing the number of ugly female characters and lowering the number of attractive ones.
If your goal is equal numbers of ugly and attractive females, then that necessitates increasing the number of uglies and lowering the number of good-lookers. So you would choose the first option.
Gamerforlife wrote:That's what I hate with sexism arguments. It's always less of this, less of that. I don't support that.
See above.
Gamerforlife wrote:I say just get more of whatever the other thing is so that everyone can be happy.
They say that you can please everyone some of the time but not all of the time. As long as there exists attractive females, feminists will continue complaining about it and males will continue masturbating to it.
Gamerforlife wrote:Getting rid of all attractive females just creates another form of sexism. You're just forcing all women in that entertainment medium into a new stereotype. One that says ladies in games must all be unattractive. One extreme isn't better than the other. Personally, I enjoy sexually exploitative games just as much as I do games with intelligent women whose sexuality isn't focused on at all. Can't we have both?
I don't see how this is relevant to my thread though. Where did I say it has to be 100% attractive females or 100% ugly females? Unless you're talking about a hypothetical extremist?
Gamerforlife wrote:Look at our culture. At one point in history being an overweight women was considered attractive. It was a sign of wealth, because anyone eating a lot had lots of money.
So what is the attractive thing here? The overweightedness or the money?
Gamerforlife wrote:Fast forward many years later and we got a culture encouraging women to starve themselves because that became the new norm for what's considered attractive.
There is a contradiction however: the majority of America is overweight or obese. Obesity is still the norm. Or, obesity has always been the norm, but what is considered attractive has changed.
Gamerforlife wrote:Isn't it better to be in a culture where being slim or big is considered okay?
Being slim (not anorexic) is objectively good. Big however, is subject to interpretation. How big are we talking about?