prfsnl_gmr wrote: Rather, it trusts the audience's intelligence to decipher the film's plot and meaning.
WOOOhhhh!
I know that wasn't a shot at Decks, but I agree wit'cha.
prfsnl_gmr wrote: Rather, it trusts the audience's intelligence to decipher the film's plot and meaning.
indecks is a great member, and I very much enjoy reading his opinions (particularly his opinions on films). It most certainly was not a shot at him, and I am sory if I caused any offense - even unintentionally. I will edit my post.Luke wrote:prfsnl_gmr wrote: Rather, it trusts the audience's intelligence to decipher the film's plot and meaning.
WOOOhhhh!
I know that wasn't a shot at Decks, but I agree wit'cha.
Raiiban wrote:That's a moral dilemma. Capitalism has no morals.
Another fun fact, the "Painter of Light" Thomas Kinkade was a background artist for this film...and anyone with even a passing interest in art would probably consider it his best work.MulishaSoldier929 wrote: Watched the 1983 movie "fire and ice" last night. Not sure what to think. I am a sucker for that style of animation but overall the movie did suck lol. Fun Fact: Turns out Robert Rodriguez bought the rights to fire and ice a couple years back and plans on directing an animated remake. Kool stuff.
Fire and Ice was pretty good.indecks wrote:I saw Fire and Ice years ago. I don't remember much. I know it was in a time when I 'discovered' that American animation was trying to be more adult like Anime.
I remember watching Light Years (Gandahar), Heavy Metal, and some other one I can't remember... street fight?
