I'm just saying that's how a lot of people see it. Whether that's fair or not is another argument. I got my 3DS a couple months back when some cool exclusive games started rolling out that I wanted and I can probably say I'll do the same when there's more things that I'd like on Vita.dsheinem wrote:Oh, so it is basically just like a Nintendo handheld? I don't understand this criticism, to be honest. People don't complain that Mario Kart DS is just a "port" of another Mario Kart game, that Super Mario 3D Land is a "downscaled" version of Super Mario Galaxy, that MGS:3D is a "downscaled" version of MGS3, etc. So why claim that Little Big Planet Vita or Wipeout 2048 are "downscaled" versions of those games? It just isn't a reasonable criticism, especially since almost any handheld game in an existing series will be a little less flashy/substantive than its console brethren.CavZee wrote: The key problem for me and many others is that a lot of the good games are ports or downscaled (in terms of design) console style spinoffs. If I have a PS3, than that takes a huge chunk of the library's appeal out of the equation.
Sony also doesn't really seem to know what to do with the device, or at the very least how to convey it.Thus far, the Vita strategy and success is pretty much on par - if not slightly better - than it was with the PSP at this point in its life. If anything, there are more original titles and games to choose from, and a lot more games that can be accessed on it (including a healthy selection of the PSP and PS1 libraries).In other news I just bought a PSP. =D
In the meantime I'll be catching up on PSP stuff. In fact, if I could somehow play physical PSP games on Vita then I'd probably already own one.
Oh and MGS3D is a poor downscaled version of MGS3. Also, 3D Land is nothing like the Galaxy games. ;D