Nintendo vs Lets Play

NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii
Raiiban
24-bit
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:30 pm
Location: Outside Philly, PA
Contact:

Re: Nintendo vs Lets Play

Post by Raiiban »

marurun wrote:
ZeroAX wrote:
MrPopo wrote:I remember when Modern Warfare 2 on the PC got boycotted and sold no copies.

Oh wait, the opposite happened.


You're talking to the only person who seems to have upheld both the L4D2 and the MW2 boycott :lol:


Why was there a boycott of L4D2?

Valve had the gall to make a sequel instead of continuing to make more campaigns available for free of L4D1.
User avatar
marurun
Moderator
Posts: 12261
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Nintendo vs Lets Play

Post by marurun »

Raiiban wrote:
marurun wrote:Why was there a boycott of L4D2?

Valve had the gall to make a sequel instead of continuing to make more campaigns available for free of L4D1.


Oh, OK. I remember that, now. They had promised ongoing support of L4D and it got very little because they instead redirected that effort to L4D2. Their loss. I know tons of peeps who prefer the original.
User avatar
LBJeff
24-bit
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:07 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Nintendo vs Lets Play

Post by LBJeff »

Not like this is the first time Nintendo has done this. Some rumors say they pulled IP rights on James Rolfe back when he was the Angry Nintendo Nerd. That's the whole reason he changed it to Angry Video Game Nerd. I know it says on his site that he changed it to prevent trademark issues, so whether he initiated it or they did, it's the same result.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Nintendo vs Lets Play

Post by ZeroAX »

LBJeff wrote:Not like this is the first time Nintendo has done this. Some rumors say they pulled IP rights on James Rolfe back when he was the Angry Nintendo Nerd. That's the whole reason he changed it to Angry Video Game Nerd. I know it says on his site that he changed it to prevent trademark issues, so whether he initiated it or they did, it's the same result.


But he couldn't sell merchandise with the word Nintendo on them. They didn't try to stop him from making any money off his reviews.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
marurun
Moderator
Posts: 12261
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Nintendo vs Lets Play

Post by marurun »

User avatar
BurningDoom
Next-Gen
Posts: 5953
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:14 am

Re: Nintendo vs Lets Play

Post by BurningDoom »

I think Nintendo is shooting themselves in foot with this decision. Lets Play is no different than a fan tribute, a review, fan-fic, or a song cover. This is fan-interaction that gives Nintendo free publicity.

However to be directly confrontational with those same fans, and slapping on the wrist because they love your product; is just gonna drive away that fanbase.

Legally, they did nothing wrong. But they did make a huge mistake with the fans.
Game Trade/Want List:
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=28206

Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
Post Reply