YouTube's policy with video game footage has got to be the most confusing legal matter ever. I'm happy to see his channel up and running again, but what? Why did they have to go through all that trouble?
YouTube's policy with video game footage has got to be the most confusing legal matter ever. I'm happy to see his channel up and running again, but what? Why did they have to go through all that trouble?
Copyright infringement removal is largely automatic when triggered. They take down in order to not be sued for having it up. Once they reviewed it, however, they likely decided it was well within the bounds of fair use.
Luke wrote:Hey. Remember when I said people maybe jumping to conclusions?
What other conclusions can be made? You believe that you must get permission from the creator to make a game review, so what creator would ever give permission to someone who might give their game a bad review? Making reviews pointless.
There was a guy running around claiming to be responsible for getting the account taken down. He was mad about the Cheetahmen II kickstarter thing or something.