Thank you for posting this.
I don't know if this is just me being defensive (I would like opinions) but her writing increasingly puts me off. Is that me being sexist without knowing (genuine question)?
I read the introductory part of the post and didn't like it, maybe it is just not my style but it is not how I would start a follow up on this kind of topic at all.
I don't think she argued well enough on why she did not stand up for herself, cross-referencing the gaslighting article and basically concluding the she learned to shut up and write about it after.
But according to the original article she DID stand up to herself on what she apparently felt was minor compared to the "keyboard prying" incident. So at least I still don't understand what happened there.
I'm not saying she must put herself on the spot or then she has no right to write about it.
And then she closes that section with "retroactively standing up for myself to much greater effect". How can there be greater effect than stopping it from happening in the first place, instead of complaining about it retroactively? I wonder what Rosa Parks would feel about "retroactive greater effect". Like Norris mentions - this is not even mutually exclusively, she could stand up for herself right there AND write about it (and the other incidents).
I agree with her not naming and shaming the PR rep for many reasons (primarily that the particular PR rep wasn't necessarily being that sexist, I would not conclude that just from one account and particularly from her subjective account). I once again dislike her assumption that her not naming the guy is making people uncomfortable because people just want to find a scapegoat and be done with it.
I think she should also give more relevance to the fact that she was idling in the game when the incident happened. Flawed comparison but, is it sexist for a man to offer to open a jar for a woman when she appears to be struggling to open it, if the same man would offer to open a jar for ANYONE that appears to be struggling to open a jar? I don't think so.
Possibly the worst part of it is how she dismisses the accounts from those other females that say "I am a woman and this did not happen to me", although I guess it must be disturbing for her, her assertions are not reasonable.
I also don't know why she even mentioned that she was wearing a pink skirt in the original article, I think that sadly may have motivated some of the "blame the victim" mentality that she reportedly got.
In the end, she has the right idea: it is still a problem. But I don't think she had a good approach as a journalist.
Ivo.