???AppleQueso wrote:fuck you all I loved RE4 regardless of its horror factor
RE4 rules. What's the conversation?
???AppleQueso wrote:fuck you all I loved RE4 regardless of its horror factor
I just saw one or two posts saying they hated itnoiseredux wrote:???AppleQueso wrote:fuck you all I loved RE4 regardless of its horror factor
RE4 rules. What's the conversation?
Me again being persnickety, I guess. I liked the game for what it was. It just wasn't a Resident Evil game.noiseredux wrote:???AppleQueso wrote:fuck you all I loved RE4 regardless of its horror factor
RE4 rules. What's the conversation?
I gotta say, RE3 definitely hinted a lot at the kind of direction the series would head in.mobiusclimber wrote: Me again being persnickety, I guess. I liked the game for what it was. It just wasn't a Resident Evil game.
I haven't played the Japanese version of Arcus Odyssey, but if it doesn't have slowdown during two-player, then that would cinch it.BoneSnapDeez wrote:Some obscure picks......
I wish the American SNES versions of Arcus Odyssey and Might and Magic II had been released. Both solid games, only available in Japan (maybe Europe for M&M?).
Sonic Spinball wasn't a Sonic game, Mega Man Battle Network wasn't a Mega Man game, Banjo Kazooie Nuts and Bolts wasn't a Banjo game (more of a Toy Commander sequel if anything), and Conker's Bad Fur day was very different from the original concept and the GB game. These games aren't automatically bad, though. RE4, while drastically different and not as good as the earlier games, is still worth a play, and is by no means bad.mobiusclimber wrote:Me again being persnickety, I guess. I liked the game for what it was. It just wasn't a Resident Evil game.noiseredux wrote:???AppleQueso wrote:fuck you all I loved RE4 regardless of its horror factor
RE4 rules. What's the conversation?