Conveniently glazed over the entire SFIII trilogy there, bud?alienjesus wrote:Street Fighter 4 is way more complicated than street fighter 2. I don't see how this works out as an example at all.Lodestar wrote:Inazuma, if you wanted a good example of a series that's been "dumbed down," you should've directed everyone's attention to Street Fighter IV or MvC3. Not saying that I agree with your stance at all, but Capcom is the perfect example of a company that has dramatically changed their business model in recent years to adapt to a newer, less-established market, and in the process of doing so, alienated a lot of their older fans that currently aren't too ecstatic about their new(ish) practices.
Anyway, nothing to add about Jobs that hasn't been said already - it STINKS. /Jay Sherman
Cherry-pick all you want if you don't agree, Ono said that he wanted to simplify the series because 3S was too complex, or something to that effect. Besides, I don't even agree with your statement, since 4 was designed to be more like 2 from the ground-up and all it can really claim over 2 is more ultras, characters and focus attacks - in terms of depth, it's practically the same game. If you want to know HOW it was dumbed down, it's simple, the removal of parrying - which was a universal tool everyone could use and it made each character viable if a player's parrying abilities were good enough. Focus attacks don't have the same effect, as focus attacks vary from character to character (some characters have good focus attacks, others don't) and just in concept, it isn't the same.
