Widespread gaming history myths

The Philosophy, Art, and Social Influence of games
Gamerforlife
Next-Gen
Posts: 10184
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by Gamerforlife »

Myth
Licensed games always suck.


Many people STILL believe this despite tons of great licensed games in the past two decades. Some review I read for Batman Arkham City on a gaming website basically said that it is the first licensed game that doesn't suck. Apparently, this guy's been living in a cave

Myth
Every game was hard in the 8-bit era.


Really? Would games like Battletoads be legendary for their difficulty if that was the norm? Yet another myth you STILL see in modern reviews written by morons whenever some retro style game comes out

Myth
There were never any good Batman games before Arkham Asylum
.

Really? Batman for the NES. Batman for the Genesis. The Adventures of Batman and Robin on the SNES. Batman Returns on SNES. The Contra style, hardware pushing Batman and Robin on the Genesis. LEGO Batman

Myth
Beat'em ups suck without multi-player


I see people talk about the fun of solo-ing beat'em ups all the time and there are videos of people doing that on youtube even for modern games like Castle Crashers and Marvel Ultimate Alliance. Many people were still playing and enjoying Castle Crashers when it first came out and had no online multi-player yet, despite the vocal trolls who wanted the folks at Behemoth beheaded.. In fact, games like Devil May Cry spawned from the beat'em ups of old and are pure single player experiences
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
Lokkenjawnz
128-bit
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 6:18 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by Lokkenjawnz »

I don't know if it's just me, but a lot of these myths aren't myths at all, just peoples' opinions. This to me sounds more like people venting about others saying dumb things about videogames basically, not exactly the threads intent I believe.

However I have to chime in on the whole DLC thing. Expansion packs from back in the day are not really comparable to DLC these days. Most (emphasis being most) DLC is nowhere near the scope of older expansion packs, which were usually more akin to cheap sequels than pure expansions. That's not always the case, but it is, in my experience, the norm. The bigger issue, to me at least, is that expansion packs 10 years ago, were still physical copies (for the most part). Whereas I didn't think twice about buying Brood War, it basically doubled the number of missions, added half a dozen new units, and a whole new storyline. However if a similar game/expansion scenario were to play out these days, only as DLC (i.e. just a download, not a physical copy) I'm not sure how I'd feel about it. I have a real hard time paying for downloadable things, unless they're dirt cheap, as I tend to prefer a physical copy. However that's not really fair to developers, as there are plenty of amazing games, sold as download-only copies at the same price as a physical copy, that are absolutely worth a buy. It puts me in a weird place as a consumer, because I want to support my favorite devs, but I don't really want to buy downloadable stuff on a regular basis.

I think the bigger issue with DLC is not the DLC itself, but the precedent that it sets up. There is plenty of good DLC, that you can tell is truly a work of love from the devs, and that is an incredibly cool development in the game industry that we get these little add-ons post-release. However, the DLC model is showing the less scrupulous businesses that they can get away with nickel-and-diming us into paying multiple times for one product. It's a very strange situation time to be a videogamer, I can only hope that things end up smoothing out in the next couple of years.
My Want List!

Consoles: Sega Master System, NES Toploader, Genesis/32X, Sega CDX, SNES, 3DO FZ-1, Sega Saturn, Nintendo 64, Sega Dreamcast, Sony PS2, Nintendo Gamecube, Xbox Halo Edition, Wii, PS3
Handhelds: Atari Lynx, Sega Nomad, Neo Geo Pocket Color, GBC (Atomic Purple, Pokemon Edition), GBA (Pink OG, Silver SP, Spongebob SP+), DS (Phat, iXL), 3DS, PSP (1000, Go)
baphomet_irl
128-bit
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Éire

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by baphomet_irl »

that Halo was the first mutiplayer game with vehicular combat - seriously loads of people seem to think that, when Tribes and I'm pretty sure BF:1942 predate it, and I'm sure there were some before that...
'In the end it didn't work out. It was tough, but those were great days and I've never met anybody who regretted buying a Dreamcast.'
User avatar
Zing
Next-Gen
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by Zing »

Years ago, gamers were afraid that the "release now, patch later" mindset would infect console developers. Who would have guessed that they would end up charging money for this?
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by MrPopo »

Zing wrote:Years ago, gamers were afraid that the "release now, patch later" mindset would infect console developers. Who would have guessed that they would end up charging money for this?
I'm sorry, I can't remember paying for any bug fix patches on the console.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by noiseredux »

Lokkenjawnz wrote:I don't know if it's just me, but a lot of these myths aren't myths at all, just peoples' opinions.
yup.
Image
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by MrPopo »

noiseredux wrote:
Lokkenjawnz wrote:I don't know if it's just me, but a lot of these myths aren't myths at all, just peoples' opinions.
yup.
This is the biggest myth of all.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
ZeroAX
Next-Gen
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
Contact:

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by ZeroAX »

Myth

The Dreamcast is dead


The prophet has spoken

Image

The legend lives on. On the day the casual game bubble bursts, facebook games crumble from the weight of way too big investor expectations, when the mobile gaming scene evaporates from lousy controls and countless rip-off games of old classics, the second coming will be upon us and all gaming kind will be saved. All gamers, Nintendo, Sony, MS, Apple, whatever will join under the banner of our savior and we shall live in a DLC-less, blue skies in games world with a single godly console that plays all retro games perfectly as well as accept all controllers and add ons.

Oh, on that day, we'll also get a new Sonic game that's actually better than the Mega Drive stuff.
Last edited by ZeroAX on Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
User avatar
Erik_Twice
Next-Gen
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by Erik_Twice »

ZeroAX wrote:Myth

The Dreamcast is dead


The prophet has spoken

Image

The legend lives on. On the day the casual game bubble bursts, facebook games crumble from the weight of way too big investor expectations, when the mobile gaming scene evaporates from lousy controls and countless rip-off games of old classics, the second coming will be upon us and all gaming kind will be saved. All gamers, Nintendo, Sony, MS, Apple, whatever will join under the banner of our savior and we shall live in a DLC-less, blue skies in games world with a single godly console that plays all retro games perfectly as well as accept all controllers and add ons.

Oh, on that day, we'll also get a new Sonic game that's actually better than the Mega Drive stuff.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

There was a thread for this kind of posts where is it?
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
baphomet_irl
128-bit
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Éire

Re: Widespread gaming history myths

Post by baphomet_irl »

ZeroAX wrote:Myth

The Dreamcast is dead


The prophet has spoken

Image

The legend lives on. On the day the casual game bubble bursts, facebook games crumble from the weight of way too big investor expectations, when the mobile gaming scene evaporates from lousy controls and countless rip-off games of old classics, the second coming will be upon us and all gaming kind will be saved. All gamers, Nintendo, Sony, MS, Apple, whatever will join under the banner of our savior and we shall live in a DLC-less, blue skies in games world with a single godly console that plays all retro games perfectly as well as accept all controllers and add ons.

Oh, on that day, we'll also get a new Sonic game that's actually better than the Mega Drive stuff.
that would be ena poli POLI orea day! :)
'In the end it didn't work out. It was tough, but those were great days and I've never met anybody who regretted buying a Dreamcast.'
Post Reply