I haven't been consistently impressed with Barack, but one of the reasons I voted for him was because he promised to do this, so respect where it's due.
Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
http://my.barackobama.com/iraq-inv
I haven't been consistently impressed with Barack, but one of the reasons I voted for him was because he promised to do this, so respect where it's due.
I haven't been consistently impressed with Barack, but one of the reasons I voted for him was because he promised to do this, so respect where it's due.
My contributions to the Racketboy site:
Browser Games ... Free PC Games ... Mixtapes ... Doujin Games ... SotC Poetry
Browser Games ... Free PC Games ... Mixtapes ... Doujin Games ... SotC Poetry
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Better late than never, I guess.J T wrote:http://my.barackobama.com/iraq-inv
I haven't been consistently impressed with Barack, but one of the reasons I voted for him was because he promised to do this, so respect where it's due.
Does that mean they the US is about to strike Iran in one way or another, soon?

Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
It means the US is going to draw down the military for a bit. One thing that the US has learned since 2001 is that the rules have changed when it comes to fielding a conventional army.Breetai wrote:Better late than never, I guess.J T wrote:http://my.barackobama.com/iraq-inv
I haven't been consistently impressed with Barack, but one of the reasons I voted for him was because he promised to do this, so respect where it's due.
Does that mean they the US is about to strike Iran in one way or another, soon?
Maybe now Nintendo will acknowledge Metroid has a fanbase?
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Truth. Just use NATO instead!Flake wrote:It means the US is going to draw down the military for a bit. One thing that the US has learned since 2001 is that the rules have changed when it comes to fielding a conventional army.
But seriously, with the US economy how it is, how can they afford to be at war so often now?

Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Depends on the war. Currently we spend far too much per soldier to maintain a forward deployed force. We also lack the political will to ask the average citizens to pay any money for the wars we engage in, choosing instead to throw the cost of the war straight onto the deficit instead.Breetai wrote:But seriously, with the US economy how it is, how can they afford to be at war so often now?
Previous conflicts weren't nearly so expensive, though. All in all, I am glad we're going to draw this conflict down. I personally never believed we had any justification for invading Iraq.
Maybe now Nintendo will acknowledge Metroid has a fanbase?
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Sounds like someone wants to be re-elected.
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Come back home, and then let us focus on fixing the US.
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
What I've been thinking since the start of this year.Inazuma wrote:Sounds like someone wants to be re-elected.
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
Yup. Expect to hear a lot of "I was the one who..."Inazuma wrote:Sounds like someone wants to be re-elected.
And although health care and the economy is in the dumps, Obama is pretty good at picking off infamous bad guys.
I'm being flippant. Well, not totally, but it's good to hear our troops will be coming home.
Re: Obama ending war in Iraq. Soldiers home for holidays.
I couldn't agree with you more on all these points.Flake wrote:Depends on the war. Currently we spend far too much per soldier to maintain a forward deployed force. We also lack the political will to ask the average citizens to pay any money for the wars we engage in, choosing instead to throw the cost of the war straight onto the deficit instead.Breetai wrote:But seriously, with the US economy how it is, how can they afford to be at war so often now?
Previous conflicts weren't nearly so expensive, though. All in all, I am glad we're going to draw this conflict down. I personally never believed we had any justification for invading Iraq.
