Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
Posts: 38148
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by noiseredux »

C64 was definitely great for games. It was my first "console" when I was like 5 or 6. Haha.
Image
User avatar
KillerJuan77
Next-Gen
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:01 am

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by KillerJuan77 »

The Amiga haves some really awesome games.
Image
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by BoringSupreez »

BurningDoom wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:When it comes to old computers and their games, accessibility, etc., it goes: DOS>Apple II>C64>The Rest.
You place Apple II above C64? Why is that?
Because I have a lot more experience with Apple II than C64. I don't know C64 anywhere near as good as I know Apple II.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
ApolloBoy
128-bit
Posts: 954
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:56 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by ApolloBoy »

I'd probably go with either the Amiga or ST. If you're interested in the Amiga, I'd suggest picking up an A600 or A1200 as those have PCMCIA slots, which you can use to load games from through programs like WHDLoad. In this way, you don't have to use the floppy drive to play games from. With the ST, you can actually write ST floppies on a PC as long as you format the floppy as a 720K disk, IIRC. There's also a device for the ST called the UltraSatan which emulates a floppy drive and runs floppy images off SD cards.

As for the IIGS, it's nice in that it's backwards compatible with the Apple II, but there's not a whole lot going for it gaming-wise besides that. If you still want to get into the Apple II, I'd suggest the IIc which is small and has a built-in floppy drive.
Own: 2600, 2DS, 2DS XL, 360 S, 5200, 7800, 800, 800XL, AES, Amiga 600, C64, C64C, CV, DC, Duo-R, GB, GBA, GBA SP, GBC, GBP, Genesis 2, GG, JP SMS, Lynx, Mark III, Mega CD II, MD, MSX2+, N64, NES, NES top loader, Nomad, PCE, PSX, PS2, RetroUSB AVS, SAT, SFC, SG-1000 II, SMS, SNES mini, Switch, TE, Twin Fami, VIC-20, Wii, XEGS
User avatar
Jrecee
Next-Gen
Posts: 4520
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:33 pm

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by Jrecee »

ApolloBoy wrote:I'd probably go with either the Amiga or ST. If you're interested in the Amiga, I'd suggest picking up an A600 or A1200 as those have PCMCIA slots, which you can use to load games from through programs like WHDLoad. In this way, you don't have to use the floppy drive to play games from. With the ST, you can actually write ST floppies on a PC as long as you format the floppy as a 720K disk, IIRC. There's also a device for the ST called the UltraSatan which emulates a floppy drive and runs floppy images off SD cards.

As for the IIGS, it's nice in that it's backwards compatible with the Apple II, but there's not a whole lot going for it gaming-wise besides that. If you still want to get into the Apple II, I'd suggest the IIc which is small and has a built-in floppy drive.
Interesting to know. Where can you buy an ultrasatan? I looked into making floppies with a pc that could be used on an ST, but it seemed too complicated/not possible. If you have the ultra satan, can you just run the 'roms' that you can download anywhere?
lisalover1
Next-Gen
Posts: 4960
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:50 am
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by lisalover1 »

Your ideal solution would be trying to fmd a reasonably-priced Amiga A1200; the most powerful and compatible Amiga computer. There are a ton of games for it, and you can use a different OS than Windows; which should be an interesting experience.
Image
~My name's Vicky, by the way!~ ^_^
User avatar
Xeogred
Next-Gen
Posts: 14387
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: KC

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by Xeogred »

The Amiga had Chris Hulsbeck.

So yeah. :D
Image
HLTB | PSN Trophies | RFG (WIP)
User avatar
Gunstar Green
Next-Gen
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by Gunstar Green »

All I know is that the Amiga has an awesome library. That's where I'd go.
ATARI800XLfan
128-bit
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: Indiana U.S.A

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by ATARI800XLfan »

Just wondering but if I were to buy an Amiga with no system disks could it still play games? Also would anyone happen to have a Amiga 1000 for sale with the expanded memory on the front and possibly bottom. For some reason really like the look of the Amiga 1000 or maybe a Apple IIGS? or a Amiga 1200, USA preferably.
User avatar
CRTGAMER
Next-Gen
Posts: 11933
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:59 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Which 16-bit computer is better to collect for.

Post by CRTGAMER »

ATARI800XLfan wrote:Just wondering but if I were to buy an Amiga with no system disks could it still play games? Also would anyone happen to have a Amiga 1000 for sale with the expanded memory on the front and possibly bottom. For some reason really like the look of the Amiga 1000 or maybe a Apple IIGS? or a Amiga 1200, USA preferably.
I'm not that familiar with the Amiga. I would think the kick start discs operating system bootup is built into each disc game. The Amiga 500 is probably easier and cheaper to find then the larger Amiga series, but it is still not very common. The 8 bit C64 is probably a lot easier to find then an Amiga, Apple GS or Atari ST.
Image
CRT vs LCD - Hardware Mods - HDAdvance - Custom Controllers - Game Storage - Wii Gamecube and other Guides:
CRTGAMER Guides in Board Guides Index: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p1109425

Image
Image
Post Reply