re: lisalover's signature

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
dunpeal2064
Next-Gen
Posts: 5350
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:55 pm
Location: Central Valley, California
Contact:

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by dunpeal2064 »

I'm pretty sure Samus is considered a sex symbol because you could see her in a bikini at the end of the first game.

I dunno, kinda started down the wrong path if they didn't want her to be seen that way

To be honest though, I never even think about who is in the suit while I am playing. I just like the game mechanics. I'm talking about Super Metroid though, not Other M. I have not yet had a chance to play that.

Still seems to me that they were kinda going in the "sex symbol" idea in the first place, but the graphics weren't as good. I mean, look at her pose when she dies. Looks like she's showin us her "O" face
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24194
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by MrPopo »

AppleQueso wrote:Wait wait wait a second.

...you mean the whole "OTHER M SUCKS WHY IS SAMUS TAKING ORDERS FROM A MAN!?" thing isn't just a strawman? I thought most people hated the portrayal because she was made overly whiny and it contradicted what we were shown in previous games, not because they thought she should be some kinda misandrist symbol.
That's the whole point. It ISN'T contradicting what was shown in previous games. The closest you can claim is that there was no PTSD in previous Ridley fights. Except half the games didn't have cutscenes at all, and in other games she was expecting to run in to him. In Other M as far as she could tell she'd blasted him to space dust and so his sudden appearance triggered it.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
AppleQueso

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by AppleQueso »

It just occured to me that this stuff is exactly why Miyamoto steadfastly refuses to allow Link to have any more characterization than he's always had.
User avatar
dunpeal2064
Next-Gen
Posts: 5350
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:55 pm
Location: Central Valley, California
Contact:

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by dunpeal2064 »

AppleQueso wrote:It just occured to me that this stuff is exactly why Miyamoto steadfastly refuses to allow Link to have any more characterization than he's always had.
Considering the outrage at him saying like 1 thing in Windwaker, I can't blame him. Lol.

These games get crap like old classic bands do whenever they come out with a new album. These games are so classic that someone will always be upset when they make changes, and and others will be upset with the lack of change.
AppleQueso

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by AppleQueso »

dunpeal2064 wrote:
AppleQueso wrote:It just occured to me that this stuff is exactly why Miyamoto steadfastly refuses to allow Link to have any more characterization than he's always had.
Considering the outrage at him saying like 1 thing in Windwaker, I can't blame him. Lol.

These games get crap like old classic bands do whenever they come out with a new album. These games are so classic that someone will always be upset when they make changes, and and others will be upset with the lack of change.
I don't think most Metroid fans really wanted much of a change in the formula at all, especially towards a more narrative direction. I remember one of the big criticisms of Fusion was the fact that it let story drive your progression through the game... sound familiar?
User avatar
Erik_Twice
Next-Gen
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by Erik_Twice »

brunoafh wrote:I don't think I'd go as far as calling Samus an intentional "sex symbol", like Lara Croft or something.
A note, Lara Croft was not meant to be a "sex symbol", her huge breasts were a programming error that the developing team decided to keep, much to the creator's chagrin.

So it's quasi-intentional.
AppleQueso wrote:...you mean the whole "OTHER M SUCKS WHY IS SAMUS TAKING ORDERS FROM A MAN!?" thing isn't just a strawman? I thought most people hated the portrayal because she was made overly whiny and it contradicted what we were shown in previous games, not because they thought she should be some kinda misandrist symbol.
No, sadly it isn't =/

I have seen far more people complaining because she is a whiny woman than because she is whiny.
Looking for a cool game? Find it in my blog!
Latest post: Often, games must be difficult
http://eriktwice.com/
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by o.pwuaioc »

MrPopo wrote:That's the whole point. It ISN'T contradicting what was shown in previous games. The closest you can claim is that there was no PTSD in previous Ridley fights. Except half the games didn't have cutscenes at all, and in other games she was expecting to run in to him. In Other M as far as she could tell she'd blasted him to space dust and so his sudden appearance triggered it.
Sounds weak to me.
User avatar
MrEco
Next-Gen
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:36 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by MrEco »

o.pwuaioc wrote:
MrPopo wrote:That's the whole point. It ISN'T contradicting what was shown in previous games. The closest you can claim is that there was no PTSD in previous Ridley fights. Except half the games didn't have cutscenes at all, and in other games she was expecting to run in to him. In Other M as far as she could tell she'd blasted him to space dust and so his sudden appearance triggered it.
Sounds weak to me.
Even so, I think part of the point is that it shouldn't be wrong for her to show weakness. Weakness is part of being human and the more realistically a video game character is portrayed the easier it is to sympathize with that character. That's like rule number one of good character and plot design.
I feel old when talking to anyone my age yet too inexperienced to effectively talk to anyone older. Life is grand that way.

My twitter handle is @EckoExplores
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24194
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by MrPopo »

o.pwuaioc wrote:
MrPopo wrote:That's the whole point. It ISN'T contradicting what was shown in previous games. The closest you can claim is that there was no PTSD in previous Ridley fights. Except half the games didn't have cutscenes at all, and in other games she was expecting to run in to him. In Other M as far as she could tell she'd blasted him to space dust and so his sudden appearance triggered it.
Sounds weak to me.
Yes, because her characterization was incredibly strong in previous games.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: re: lisalover's signature

Post by o.pwuaioc »

MrPopo wrote:
o.pwuaioc wrote:
MrPopo wrote:That's the whole point. It ISN'T contradicting what was shown in previous games. The closest you can claim is that there was no PTSD in previous Ridley fights. Except half the games didn't have cutscenes at all, and in other games she was expecting to run in to him. In Other M as far as she could tell she'd blasted him to space dust and so his sudden appearance triggered it.
Sounds weak to me.
Yes, because her characterization was incredibly strong in previous games.
I don't remember the character being frozen and pummeled by enemies in Super Metroid. ;)
Post Reply