So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

The Philosophy, Art, and Social Influence of games
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by o.pwuaioc »

corn619 wrote:I love that I can fire up my SNES and play for 10 to 15 minutes and have fun since my gaming time is limited these days. After 10 mins with a new console, I've barely made it past the first loading screen.
I blame the 64 and PS1 for that. Both introduced long videos before the game actually started. Not bad, but what happened to manuals or skippable scenes? I can't start a new game of Mario 64 or Ocarina of Time without being bored for 5 minutes just watching a story. I love how I can turn on Mario for my Game Boy or Sonic for my Genesis and just start playing.
Breetai
Next-Gen
Posts: 5100
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Make you humble in Canada

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by Breetai »

o.pwuaioc wrote:
corn619 wrote:I love that I can fire up my SNES and play for 10 to 15 minutes and have fun since my gaming time is limited these days. After 10 mins with a new console, I've barely made it past the first loading screen.
I blame the 64 and PS1 for that. Both introduced long videos before the game actually started. Not bad, but what happened to manuals or skippable scenes? I can't start a new game of Mario 64 or Ocarina of Time without being bored for 5 minutes just watching a story. I love how I can turn on Mario for my Game Boy or Sonic for my Genesis and just start playing.
The N64 isn't bad for that at all. Zelda: LTTP on SNES also takes a while to start at the beginning...
Image
Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857
User avatar
Retrozoa
64-bit
Posts: 319
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 5:56 pm

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by Retrozoa »

Just watched the video, stopped after he was fumbling to list shitty games and he brought up Zelda 2. I mean, seriously?
Current systems: Atari 2600[x2], NES(top loader), SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii, Saturn, Dreamcast, Playstation, PS2, PS2 slim, xbox, xbox 360, Turbografx-16, Game Boy Pocket, Game boy SP[x2], Nintendo DS[x2], Nintendo DSi, Nintendo 3DS, Game Gear, Neo Geo Pocket Color, Wonderswan Color, Neo Geo MVS.
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by o.pwuaioc »

Breetai wrote:The N64 isn't bad for that at all. Zelda: LTTP on SNES also takes a while to start at the beginning...
They're not nearly as bad, but they can get there. And I just started up LttP to see if I had been misremembering: nope, the forced introduction is about 20 seconds of Zelda talking and 5 seconds for your uncle to walk out.

Although I guess I see the trend. After I posted that I realized that it was Miyamoto who really promoted that, him and Square (FFIV had a really long introduction that I hated being forced to sit through).

Not that I'm complaining about the overall quality of the games - I love LttP, FFIV, and Mario 64. I just wish they had built in a skip function for the introductory sequences.
User avatar
jfrost
Next-Gen
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by jfrost »

o.pwuaioc wrote:Although I guess I see the trend. After I posted that I realized that it was Miyamoto who really promoted that, him and Square (FFIV had a really long introduction that I hated being forced to sit through).
Square is funny. In FF9, to get Excalibur 2 you have to reach Memoria in less than 9 hours. To do so, you have to skip all the FMV sequences, but there isn't a way to legitimately skip them. You have to open the lid of the PS1. That was so ridiculous.
Breetai
Next-Gen
Posts: 5100
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Make you humble in Canada

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by Breetai »

o.pwuaioc wrote:
Breetai wrote:The N64 isn't bad for that at all. Zelda: LTTP on SNES also takes a while to start at the beginning...
They're not nearly as bad, but they can get there. And I just started up LttP to see if I had been misremembering: nope, the forced introduction is about 20 seconds of Zelda talking and 5 seconds for your uncle to walk out.

Although I guess I see the trend. After I posted that I realized that it was Miyamoto who really promoted that, him and Square (FFIV had a really long introduction that I hated being forced to sit through).

Not that I'm complaining about the overall quality of the games - I love LttP, FFIV, and Mario 64. I just wish they had built in a skip function for the introductory sequences.
Final Fantasy III's (err.. VI) opening was painfully long as well.

My point was that I don't think it was so prevalent on the N64, probably due to the cartridge format. There are exceptions of course, like the Zelda games. I don't think Mario 64's intro was too long.

The PS1 was definitely a culprit for this, although it would be more accurate to blame the CD medium.
Image
Sales thread. Make offers! PC Engine and Famicom: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 17#p197217.
My PC Engine/Turbografx-16 Guide: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 57#p654857
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by o.pwuaioc »

Breetai wrote:Final Fantasy III's (err.. VI) opening was painfully long as well.

My point was that I don't think it was so prevalent on the N64, probably due to the cartridge format. There are exceptions of course, like the Zelda games. I don't think Mario 64's intro was too long.

The PS1 was definitely a culprit for this, although it would be more accurate to blame the CD medium.
Point taken. I guess I was really thinking of Ocarina of Time (recently started), since I haven't started a new game of Mario 64 in a while.
User avatar
MidnightRider
32-bit
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:03 am

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by MidnightRider »

Breetai wrote:The PS1 was definitely a culprit for this, although it would be more accurate to blame the CD medium.
Definitely blame discs. Play some Sega CD/Turbo(A.K.A. PC Engine) CD titles.

There was one that had my interest for PC Engine CD that was, I think, supposed to be similar to classic Castlevania, but I couldn't even get into the game. It started with a scene at a bar where they just kept on talking(voice acting, and the game itself was a Japanese only release).....
User avatar
nathey
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by nathey »

Try waiting 20 mins for a game to load on a c64 (Test Drive anyone? :P). Then come back and say the cd formats are slow... :lol:
Image
pakopako
Next-Gen
Posts: 1654
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:29 pm

Re: So apparently "Retro Games" suck..........

Post by pakopako »

Breetai wrote:Final Fantasy III's (err.. VI) opening was painfully long as well.
...
The PS1 was definitely a culprit for this, although it would be more accurate to blame the CD medium.
But you could skip that intro (which was a credits roll) and play through the rest of it (through Narshe).

Long would be Final Fantasy IIus -- that airship sequence was long and uninterruptible. (I shudder to think what the PSx load-times were between CGI and game.)
My scheduling skills have died of dysentery; I hope to visit at least on a monthly basis.
Still, don't forget to tip your waitress.
Post Reply