If you're new to the series, Black or White.AznKhmerBoi wrote:i never gotten into pokemon games for some reason.
But i did try it for the DS and forgot what level i got to but my game saved crash and then i just kinda gave up since.
But im gonna pick up a 3ds soon so whats your suggestion for the best pokemon game for the ds?
Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
- YoshiEgg25
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 4337
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:26 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
Gaming accomplishments:
Nibbler (marathon): 251,169,160 / Nibbler (one life): 5,263,360 (WR)
Donkey Kong: 423,100 [L12-1] (150th place as of 2019-01-15)
Super Smash Bros. (N64): Ranked top 5 in Wisconsin from Q1 2016 to Q2 2017
Shrek SuperSlam: won largest tournament in game's history (Shrekfest 2018)
Speedrun.com Profile (contains multiple WRs)
Nibbler (marathon): 251,169,160 / Nibbler (one life): 5,263,360 (WR)
Donkey Kong: 423,100 [L12-1] (150th place as of 2019-01-15)
Super Smash Bros. (N64): Ranked top 5 in Wisconsin from Q1 2016 to Q2 2017
Shrek SuperSlam: won largest tournament in game's history (Shrekfest 2018)
Speedrun.com Profile (contains multiple WRs)
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
If you start with Black and White, you will have a really hard time getting into Diamond/Pearl and even Platinum because they're so much slower (slower text, slower battles, slower everything). But they're probably the worst of the series anyways.YoshiEgg25 wrote:If you're new to the series, Black or White.AznKhmerBoi wrote:i never gotten into pokemon games for some reason.
But i did try it for the DS and forgot what level i got to but my game saved crash and then i just kinda gave up since.
But im gonna pick up a 3ds soon so whats your suggestion for the best pokemon game for the ds?
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
I remember having a hard time getting pokemon red or blue. I think I got Blue first then red. I remember the female worker trying to sell me there used gb copy display version at the same price, it could be worth if it "not for resale", but not sure.
It was worthless to buy pokemon red, blue, green gba version. I stop playing pokemon right after finishing the original gold version. Gameshark was worth getting instead of buying the silver version or trading with a friend.
It was worthless to buy pokemon red, blue, green gba version. I stop playing pokemon right after finishing the original gold version. Gameshark was worth getting instead of buying the silver version or trading with a friend.
You took too long, now your candy's gone. That's What happens. Bkowwwww. (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
I'm going to agree with your logic. I for one remember looking through a guidebook to find out which pokemon were exclusive to what version before ultimately choosing to buy Red. So I think the exclusives do play a role.wootcube wrote:I think it has a lot to do with the exclusives in each version, which kind of ties into the box art in the later games.
Personally, I picked:
Red - easy choice, it had a dragon on the front. As opposed to a turtle.
Silver - Lugia > Ho-Oh
Ruby - Kyroge and Groudon both kinda sucked, so it was the lesser of two evils.
Leafgreen - VENUSAUR!!!
Diamond - all my friends wanted pearl.
Black - all my friends wanted White and I kind of don't really care at this point.
Now, see. My experience is just the opposite. I usually find more copies of LeafGreen, than FireRed, especially during recent trips to Gamestops. I haven't seen a copy of FireRed in the wild for quite a whileAmishSamurai wrote:...*Remake- I've found more wild copies of FireRed than I have LeafGreen...
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
But...but.....Meowth. (I was so pissed off he was a blue exclusiveMichi wrote: I for one remember looking through a guidebook to find out which pokemon were exclusive to what version before ultimately choosing to buy Red
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
I was too until I finally got one from a friend...it sucked. And then I didn't feel so badZeroAX wrote:But...but.....Meowth. (I was so pissed off he was a blue exclusiveMichi wrote: I for one remember looking through a guidebook to find out which pokemon were exclusive to what version before ultimately choosing to buy Red)
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
I know he sucked, but just like a Pikachu you don't evolve, it's the coolness/cuteness factor that makes you use him.wootcube wrote: I was too until I finally got one from a friend...it sucked. And then I didn't feel so bad
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
-
XxBroBuzzxX
- 32-bit
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:01 pm
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
Back in the day I choose version I'd buy on which one had a cooler cover. Nowadays however, I choose what version to buy based on one has better pokemon/better items and such.
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
haha, true.ZeroAX wrote:I know he sucked, but just like a Pikachu you don't evolve, it's the coolness/cuteness factor that makes you use him.wootcube wrote: I was too until I finally got one from a friend...it sucked. And then I didn't feel so bad
-
Balasubbie
- 128-bit
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:15 am
Re: Is one version of a Pokemon game usually more popular?
'Cos you find alot of parents buying Game boys for their newborns?noiseredux wrote:makes sense. I mean traditionally the color to paint a baby boy's nursery is red.Balasubbie wrote:I read this interesting argument (another forum) that the 'boy' colours generally outsell the 'girl' colours, as by and large, more guys game than girls. I mean, it will start a discussion on what's considered boyish and girlish, but I did find it intriguing enough. Like say, Red, which is an aggressive colour, outsold Blue, which is much calmer, generally young men are more aggressive than girls, so they'd go with red and vice versa. I find it really curious anyways, regardless of it merit. There's more guy gamers than girl gamers, so there'd be more boys growing up and discarding their games thus it plays into the above posts of more manlier colours being available in the wild. Mind, I find Ruby far, far more prevalent used than Sapphire and Emerald.

