Voted for consistency and highly animated.
When a game has one highly detailed thing and a undetailed thing, then the illusion of another uniform world is hampered. Even if the graphics are bad, if they are consistent, the visual world is much more convincing.
High amount of animation goes without saying.
Best graphics for games, in my opinion? Sonic 3, Mario 64, Comix Zone, Mark of the Wolves, Karous/Radilgy/Ikaruga, Ogre Battle 64, Golden Sun.
Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
I didn't vote. There was no check box for nudity.
Systems: TI-99/4a, Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, NES, SMS, GB, Neo Geo MVS (Big Red 4-slot), Genesis, SNES, 3DO, PS1, N64, DC, PS2, GBA, GCN, NDSi, Wii
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
It really annoys me how much "modern" gamers think of graphics. A guy who I actually respected on a PS3 forum, said he doesn't consider the DS hardcore, but he says that the iphone got a great hardcore game with Rage.
Ok first I think hardcore and casual is stupid, but besides that, how the fuck is a rail shooter considered a hard core game in this day and age? Well it's because it has "hardcore" graphics.
I wish we could just get over the graphics race started by Sega with the Mega Drive.
Ok first I think hardcore and casual is stupid, but besides that, how the fuck is a rail shooter considered a hard core game in this day and age? Well it's because it has "hardcore" graphics.
I wish we could just get over the graphics race started by Sega with the Mega Drive.
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
- alienjesus
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 8875
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
- Location: London, UK.
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
The graphics race started much earlier than that.ZeroAX wrote:It really annoys me how much "modern" gamers think of graphics. A guy who I actually respected on a PS3 forum, said he doesn't consider the DS hardcore, but he says that the iphone got a great hardcore game with Rage.
Ok first I think hardcore and casual is stupid, but besides that, how the fuck is a rail shooter considered a hard core game in this day and age? Well it's because it has "hardcore" graphics.
I wish we could just get over the graphics race started by Sega with the Mega Drive.
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
Turbografx-16!alienjesus wrote:The graphics race started much earlier than that.ZeroAX wrote:It really annoys me how much "modern" gamers think of graphics. A guy who I actually respected on a PS3 forum, said he doesn't consider the DS hardcore, but he says that the iphone got a great hardcore game with Rage.
Ok first I think hardcore and casual is stupid, but besides that, how the fuck is a rail shooter considered a hard core game in this day and age? Well it's because it has "hardcore" graphics.
I wish we could just get over the graphics race started by Sega with the Mega Drive.
Sale thread (please buy!): http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=19428
- AznKhmerBoi
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:04 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
god i do get annoy by those modern gamers too. I can play at their level with modern games, but when u kick back old school platerformer or shooters i got them own.
[quote="ZeroAX"]It really annoys me how much "modern" gamers think of graphics. A guy who I actually respected on a PS3 forum, said he doesn't consider the DS hardcore, but he says that the iphone got a great hardcore game with Rage.
quote]
[quote="ZeroAX"]It really annoys me how much "modern" gamers think of graphics. A guy who I actually respected on a PS3 forum, said he doesn't consider the DS hardcore, but he says that the iphone got a great hardcore game with Rage.
quote]
PSN- jacktsang05
WiiU- jacktsang05

WiiU- jacktsang05

- hashiriya1
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 11:59 am
- Location: San Francisco Bay
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
Anything with Blast Processing produces great graphics.
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
Yeah, I seem to remember several Intellivision ads that made mention of how much better their graphics looked compared to the Atari 2600. Of course, no one cared, because Atari 2600 had the games.alienjesus wrote:The graphics race started much earlier than that.ZeroAX wrote:It really annoys me how much "modern" gamers think of graphics. A guy who I actually respected on a PS3 forum, said he doesn't consider the DS hardcore, but he says that the iphone got a great hardcore game with Rage.
Ok first I think hardcore and casual is stupid, but besides that, how the fuck is a rail shooter considered a hard core game in this day and age? Well it's because it has "hardcore" graphics.
I wish we could just get over the graphics race started by Sega with the Mega Drive.
- ZeroAX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:20 am
- Location: Current: Amsterdam. From Greece
- Contact:
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
yeah, but when did gamers start talking shit about a console because of its graphics;
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
- D.D.D.
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: of the Estrecho de Gibraltar is where now?
- Contact:
Re: Graphically whats "good" in your opinion?
Since forever dude~!ZeroAX wrote:yeah, but when did gamers start talking shit about a console because of its graphics;
(FC, AVFC, NES, SFC x2, SNES, N64, GC x2, Wii x2)*(G&W x7, GB, GBpocket, GBASP, DS-L x2)
(GEN, SS x3, DC x3)*(PCE-Duo)*(Xbox:500GB)*(NGCDZ, NGPC)*(PS1, PStwo, PS3:160GB, PSP.3K)
(GEN, SS x3, DC x3)*(PCE-Duo)*(Xbox:500GB)*(NGCDZ, NGPC)*(PS1, PStwo, PS3:160GB, PSP.3K)
