Microsoft also has videogames, bing,Windows mobile, Zune,Microsoft surface
just for the sake of discussion.....
yeah but those are hardly as successful as ipod and iphone (I'm not counting the ipad a success yet, going to have to wait a year to see if it sells once the hype settles down).
heck the 360 is having trouble keeping up with it's competitors, I don't see Bing winning marketshare against google any time soon, Windows mobile I don't know anything about so I won't comment, Zune from what I read online is not that much of a hot seller, and like WM I don't know anything about the surface so I will not comment
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
Microsoft also has videogames, bing,Windows mobile, Zune,Microsoft surface
just for the sake of discussion.....
yeah but those are hardly as successful as ipod and iphone (I'm not counting the ipad a success yet, going to have to wait a year to see if it sells once the hype settles down).
heck the 360 is having trouble keeping up with it's competitors, I don't see Bing winning marketshare against google any time soon, Windows mobile I don't know anything about so I won't comment, Zune from what I read online is not that much of a hot seller, and like WM I don't know anything about the surface so I will not comment
hmmmm....
So if all the things I mentioned are not successful and profitable
that makes almost Windows 7 the only important profitable thing at microsoft
and Apple has Max os x, hardware, ipod, ipad, iphone and itunes store very successful.
Does this mean Apple is worth more than Microsoft now?
kingmohd84 wrote:
hmmmm....
So if all the things I mentioned are not successful and profitable
that makes almost Windows 7 the only important profitable thing at microsoft
and Apple has Max os x, hardware, ipod, ipad, iphone and itunes store very successful.
Does this mean Apple is worth more than Microsoft now?
don't forget MS office. Windows and MS office have been Microsoft's main bread winners for over a decade.
About your last question I don't know. If Apple's share is more expensive than Microsoft, then to an investor Apple is more valuable, but as total worth goes, I think it's
price of share X number of shares
BoneSnapDeez wrote:The success of a console is determined by how much I enjoy it.
First of all what is that map supposed to be, the areas where people like the number 70?
And who cares, macs aren't that great, I'm typing on one right now and I use them constantly at school. They have the same sort of retarted problems that windows machines tend to have, except they also have worse hardware and far less freeware.
If I didn't live near an Apple store I would have gotten rid of mine by now, I've had to get the logic board replaced twice, and my dvd drive needs to be replaced, and this is only in 2 years.
Plus the people in Apple stores are mostly trendy douches. A handful of the genius bar guys are alright, but most refuse to admit any real problems with the hardware or software. Also the UIs of Windows 7 and new linux distros make OSX look and feel flat out archaic.
There's good things about macs for sure, and I can understand why people like them. But Apple goes through phases of being pretty good price/power wise, and being pretty bad, all while acting really obnoxious as a company.
Looks like Apple did speak out regarding the suicides, but the phenomenon seems far from over.
What's to conclude with the original story is that consumer tastes have dominated gadget sales (over actual usability in business activities), which made Apple quite successful.
Wikipedia wrote:
Linux malware
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Linux operating system, Unix and other Unix-like computer operating systems are generally regarded as well-protected, though not immune from computer viruses. Linux does provide better protection compared to Microsoft Windows.
There has not yet been a widespread Linux malware threat of the type that Microsoft Windows software faces; this is commonly attributed to the malware's lack of root access and fast updates to most Linux vulnerabilities.
The number of malicious programs—including viruses, Trojans, and other threats—specifically written for Linux has been on the increase in recent years and more than doubled during 2005 from 422 to 863.
Any computer operating system is capable of getting a virus. Virus designers tend to focus on Windows since it's the most popular operating system in the world.
Wikipedia wrote:
Linux malware
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Linux operating system, Unix and other Unix-like computer operating systems are generally regarded as well-protected, though not immune from computer viruses. Linux does provide better protection compared to Microsoft Windows.
There has not yet been a widespread Linux malware threat of the type that Microsoft Windows software faces; this is commonly attributed to the malware's lack of root access and fast updates to most Linux vulnerabilities.
The number of malicious programs—including viruses, Trojans, and other threats—specifically written for Linux has been on the increase in recent years and more than doubled during 2005 from 422 to 863.
Any computer operating system is capable of getting a virus. Virus designers tend to focus on Windows since it's the most popular operating system in the world.
And because the virus creators are avid Linux users who just can't stand the big corporations! "OPEN SOURCE! OPEN SOURCE!"
I wish all viruses would just go away, so utterly pointless.
In the meantime, Mac and Linux users are safe. Sure, there are viruses out there, somewhere... It's just not enough to even think about getting some anti viral software. I wish Windows users wouldn't have to use that shit either, it just slows the computer down and causes problems.
"Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. I'm off to play Sega"-HAL 9000