I don't understand why people are up in arms about shovelware coming out on the Wii. A company put up their own money to develop/publish the game. If they don't make money, well, they won't make those type of games anymore.
The question I ask for those who complain is "Would you rather have some sort of review board that determines what game can/can't be released on the platform?" If I recall correctly, there were many instances of censorship/restrictions by Nintendo back in the NES days. I think having a more open platform is the right thing to do.
Seriously Nintendo...Really?
-
gtmtnbiker
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:14 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
-
casterofdreams
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:35 am
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
Well from what I've observed, Nintendo and third parties alike have focused there resources to the Nintendo DS. There have been more games with an aggregate score of 85 and above on Metacritic. And I don't blame them. It is easier and cheaper to produce games for a portable system than any of the consoles.
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
Man, I need to get myself a DS.
- super_aggro_crag
- 8-bit
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:52 pm
- Contact:
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
hashiriya1 wrote:super_aggro_crag wrote: Why would i want to play a game that simulates the life of a minimum wage job?
Because some of them are fun.
Touche...
Lifelong game obsession!
Atari 2600, Colecovision, NES, SNES, Nintendo 64, Nintendo Gamecube, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360
Atari 2600, Colecovision, NES, SNES, Nintendo 64, Nintendo Gamecube, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360
- super_aggro_crag
- 8-bit
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:52 pm
- Contact:
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
I try to stay optimistic about people but I am always proven wrong...Devezu wrote:YOU vastly overestimate the intelligence of people in general.MrPopo wrote:You vastly overestimate the intelligence of the average American.super_aggro_crag wrote: With the popularity of the internet and plenty of review sites out there you would think products like this would not come out with consumers being more educated with what they buy now a-days. But also I'm not taking into account the market of people gift buying knowing nothing of the business and its better products.
take for instance failblog.org
Lifelong game obsession!
Atari 2600, Colecovision, NES, SNES, Nintendo 64, Nintendo Gamecube, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360
Atari 2600, Colecovision, NES, SNES, Nintendo 64, Nintendo Gamecube, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360
-
AppleQueso
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
That's what "concept approval" is. Microsoft has it, Sony has it (though they recently lifted it on the ps2), Nintendo had it until the Wii came out.gtmtnbiker wrote:I don't understand why people are up in arms about shovelware coming out on the Wii. A company put up their own money to develop/publish the game. If they don't make money, well, they won't make those type of games anymore.
The question I ask for those who complain is "Would you rather have some sort of review board that determines what game can/can't be released on the platform?" If I recall correctly, there were many instances of censorship/restrictions by Nintendo back in the NES days. I think having a more open platform is the right thing to do.
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
Remember, Daikatana made it through "content approval".AppleQueso wrote:That's what "concept approval" is. Microsoft has it, Sony has it (though they recently lifted it on the ps2), Nintendo had it until the Wii came out.gtmtnbiker wrote:I don't understand why people are up in arms about shovelware coming out on the Wii. A company put up their own money to develop/publish the game. If they don't make money, well, they won't make those type of games anymore.
The question I ask for those who complain is "Would you rather have some sort of review board that determines what game can/can't be released on the platform?" If I recall correctly, there were many instances of censorship/restrictions by Nintendo back in the NES days. I think having a more open platform is the right thing to do.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
-
AppleQueso
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
You have to have a really really terrible idea to not make it through concept approval.MrPopo wrote:Remember, Daikatana made it through "content approval".AppleQueso wrote:That's what "concept approval" is. Microsoft has it, Sony has it (though they recently lifted it on the ps2), Nintendo had it until the Wii came out.gtmtnbiker wrote:I don't understand why people are up in arms about shovelware coming out on the Wii. A company put up their own money to develop/publish the game. If they don't make money, well, they won't make those type of games anymore.
The question I ask for those who complain is "Would you rather have some sort of review board that determines what game can/can't be released on the platform?" If I recall correctly, there were many instances of censorship/restrictions by Nintendo back in the NES days. I think having a more open platform is the right thing to do.
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
For G-d's sake, don't eat the purple pickle!!!!!Hatta wrote:Just because a game has a crappy premise, doesn't mean it's a crappy game. Cool Spot seems like it would be marketing shlock, but it's an excellent platformer. Fast Food on the 2600 is an awesome game.
Last edited by Golgo 14 on Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
marurun wrote: We’re not going to rubber stamp your horrible decisions.
Re: Seriously Nintendo...Really?
You have to have a really really terrible idea to not make it through concept approval.[/quote]AppleQueso wrote:Remember, Daikatana made it through "content approval".
So we're agreed that content approval means nothing.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
