3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24199
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by MrPopo »

elvis wrote:
MrPopo wrote:In order to be able to use an existing set each eye would be getting a 3D image at 30 FPS, which is low enough to be noticable when it switches back and forth from a right eye and left eye image.
You know most Sega Saturn games ran at 30FPS, right?

And with delayed rendering techniques, many next-gen games run at around that for final output to screen for big chunks of gameplay too?

(Not forgetting film runs at 24FPS too).
I'm not saying 30 FPS isn't perfectly playable. It always makes me laugh when I see people complaining because they only get 40 FPS maxed out on whatever new game they're playing is. However, that's 30 FPS to both eyes at the same time. The 3D effect is switching between each eye and giving each eye 30 FPS offset from one another by a frame at a time.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by Niode »

MrPopo wrote:
corn619 wrote:I don't see why they just can't make it so you could keep your existing HDTV and use some special glasses. There has to be a way you can just wear the glasses, and just update your console or player to enable 3D. Granted, I don't really know how the new 3D works but, its gonna be a tough sell to get people to dish out for a new screen. Especially since most people have replaced their existing sets with the recent price drops on HDTVs in the last couple years.
In order to be able to use an existing set each eye would be getting a 3D image at 30 FPS, which is low enough to be noticable when it switches back and forth from a right eye and left eye image.
That's only for LCDs though. Plasmas can run up to 600hz. Which is more than enough for a 120hz refresh (ie 60 FPS alternating left/right scene).
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
Mod_Man_Extreme
Next-Gen
Posts: 6845
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:05 am
Location: Statesville, North Carolina
Contact:

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by Mod_Man_Extreme »

Niode wrote:
MrPopo wrote:
corn619 wrote:I don't see why they just can't make it so you could keep your existing HDTV and use some special glasses. There has to be a way you can just wear the glasses, and just update your console or player to enable 3D. Granted, I don't really know how the new 3D works but, its gonna be a tough sell to get people to dish out for a new screen. Especially since most people have replaced their existing sets with the recent price drops on HDTVs in the last couple years.
In order to be able to use an existing set each eye would be getting a 3D image at 30 FPS, which is low enough to be noticable when it switches back and forth from a right eye and left eye image.
That's only for LCDs though. Plasmas can run up to 600hz. Which is more than enough for a 120hz refresh (ie 60 FPS alternating left/right scene).
Ditto, same thing for HD-CRT's, my set manufactured in 2007 scans at 120hz by default (Take that LCD 120hz hype machine!) and has the ability to go much, much, much higher than that.
My Consoles:
Genesis - Nomad - SegaCD - GameGear - Sega Saturn - Dreamcast - NES - SNES - N64 - Gamecube - Wii - Playstation - PSone & LCD - PS2 - PS3 - Xbox - 3DS
Niode wrote:Send him a dodgy cheque. Make it out to Scammy McScammerson.
Check out my sale thread below, NeoGeo MVS carts & Arcade gear wanted!:
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=11366
Limewater
Next-Gen
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Northern Alabama

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by Limewater »

J T wrote:I also don't think a movie like Avatar can properly be appreciated because it is a terrible movie.
Fixed your post.
Systems: TI-99/4a, Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, NES, SMS, GB, Neo Geo MVS (Big Red 4-slot), Genesis, SNES, 3DO, PS1, N64, DC, PS2, GBA, GCN, NDSi, Wii
User avatar
DownSince86
24-bit
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:03 am
Location: USA

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by DownSince86 »

Rad Racer beat them to the punch by about 23 years. :lol:

It has always been gimmicky but maybe it'll catch on some day. I also think that if you could get rid of the glasses more people would give it a try.

I've personally never been a fan of it. But if they ever get TVs to the point where they are like TVs in the Jetsons cartoon I'd be all over it.
Image
User avatar
GSZX1337
Next-Gen
Posts: 5805
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Madison, TN

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by GSZX1337 »

Limewater wrote:
J T wrote:I also don't think a movie like Avatar can properly be appreciated because it is a mediocre movie.
Fixed your post.
Fixed the fixing. :P

Hmm, Project Natal, 3D Gaming, damn, everyone's just rehashing Sega's ideas.

Sega: Ahead of the game since the 1980s :lol:
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
User avatar
J T
Next-Gen
Posts: 12417
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:21 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by J T »

I loved Avatar. Stop trying to "fix" me. I'm not broken. :evil:
My contributions to the Racketboy site:
Browser Games ... Free PC Games ... Mixtapes ... Doujin Games ... SotC Poetry
User avatar
GSZX1337
Next-Gen
Posts: 5805
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Madison, TN

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by GSZX1337 »

J T wrote:I loved Avatar. Stop trying to "fix" me. I'm not broken. :evil:
I'm afraid that you needed fixing. Avatar was a derivative, archetypal, preachy, CGI eye fuck.
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
User avatar
J T
Next-Gen
Posts: 12417
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:21 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by J T »

It's not that I am unaware that the movie had a heavy handed message or that it is basically Dances with Wolves where the wolves are blue people, but the special effects were unlike any seen before. It created a tangible and spectacularly beautiful fantasy world. Now the script pales in comparison to the effects, which makes the script seem worse than it is (it's an ok story, not great), but there has been no other movie where I have so felt like I was IN that new world. The only other fantasy world that has been this compelling, in my opinion, is the Dark Crystal (which was also criticized for having a poor script, a heavy handed message, and generally too scary for its underaged target audience).
My contributions to the Racketboy site:
Browser Games ... Free PC Games ... Mixtapes ... Doujin Games ... SotC Poetry
User avatar
GSZX1337
Next-Gen
Posts: 5805
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Madison, TN

Re: 3D IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING. . . gimmicks

Post by GSZX1337 »

J T wrote:It's not that I am unaware that the movie had a heavy handed message or that it is basically Dances with Wolves where the wolves are blue people, but the special effects were unlike any seen before. It created a tangible and spectacularly beautiful fantasy world. Now the script pales in comparison to the effects, which makes the script seem worse than it is (it's an ok story, not great), but there has been no other movie where I have so felt like I was IN that new world.
Can't really reply to that. You pretty much said what I thought of the film. (SFX taking a back seat to good story, mainly)

I guess the only thing I can say is that I couldn't get immersed in the movie. The score was... eh. Every time something whimsical or magical happened, there was something to break the mood (mainly the chick Na'vi making creature noises). There was too much... WTHF in the movie as well. I mean, why the hell do the Na'vi hiss? Why the hell do the Na'vi have a literal connection with Pandora? (seriously, they connect with their horses with their hair) Why are there floating mountains? I'm in the majority on this one, James Cameron could've at least come up with some half-assed excuse. Why couldn't James Cameron have done Terminator 3/Salvaion and Alien 3/Resurrection instead?

This is not a bad movie by any means. I like the Mecha with the giant knife, even though it's useless in real life situations. The entire final battle was fantasic. It was exciting, it focused on all of the main protagonists (although it did kill most), and well, the giant knife. :P I'm actually thinking of seeing the film again just so I can see it again. (last time I had a bad seat for the 3D, so it was sub par)

I think Avatar will have what I call the "Halo effect". The people who found it average or mediocre are going to say they hate it out of their frustration that it's so overrated.
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
Post Reply