Wow, Half Life 2 is really not that impressive

Neo-Geo, Arcade, Portable, & Every Other Platform
User avatar
emwearz
Next-Gen
Posts: 4838
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:24 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Wow, Half Life 2 is really not that impressive

Post by emwearz »

I think a big problem with games that have as much hype as HL2 does is that if you dont play it at close to the time of its release the hype surrounding them builds unrealistic expectations.

I found the game very enjoyable and have finished both the chapters released afterward, the blend of adventure and hard story line with a shooter makes me more inclined to finish it rather than 'kill everything that comes' style shooters.

Great game, despite being heavily over hyped.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Wow, Half Life 2 is really not that impressive

Post by BoringSupreez »

I love Half-Life 2 so much (it's my favorite game ever!), that I can't understand people who don't like it. I especially don't understand the "too long" complaint. I have always found it annoying how short modern shooters usually are, so Half-Life 2 was a breath of fresh air for me.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: Wow, Half Life 2 is really not that impressive

Post by Pulsar_t »

I tried playing System Shock 2 recently and despite being a big cyberpunk fan the game didn't draw me in at all, mainly due to its ancient graphics and physics. The same could go for HL2 because it's not future-proof either. The physics are already simplistic by today's standards, and thanks to multiple delays the finished product didn't impress me all that much. Still a classic like the first HL however.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
User avatar
bobbynewmarkiii
128-bit
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:37 am
Location: BANNED

Re: Wow, Half Life 2 is really not that impressive

Post by bobbynewmarkiii »

^^^

Dude, keep at it... SS2 is peerless. I even find the original system shock worth playing, despite it's awkward, pre quake, fps control interface. I also feel that outdated technology is somewhat ingrained in the cyberpunk ethos - without the punk aspect (read DIY, anti corporate - i.e. not buying the latest and greatest graphics card), it's just regular SF.
User avatar
AwesomeMonstar
128-bit
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: Wow, Half Life 2 is really not that impressive

Post by AwesomeMonstar »

Pulsar_t wrote:I tried playing System Shock 2 recently and despite being a big cyberpunk fan the game didn't draw me in at all, mainly due to its ancient graphics and physics. The same could go for HL2 because it's not future-proof either. The physics are already simplistic by today's standards, and thanks to multiple delays the finished product didn't impress me all that much. Still a classic like the first HL however.
While you cant fix the physics, they do have some texture packs that make the game look pretty damn good.

Don't that just look oh so tasty?
NES-GB-GENESIS-SNES-GBC-32X-SATURN-3DO-N64-DREAMCAST-GBA-PS2-XBOX-GAMECUBE-DS-PSP-WII-360
Post Reply