"gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
BoneSnapDeez
Next-Gen
Posts: 20148
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 1:08 pm
Location: Maine

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by BoneSnapDeez »

Visual novels are most certainly video games. The "limited interaction" piece doesn't disqualify them; there's no established standard about how much interaction or player manipulation needs to take place for a specific bit of media to be considered a "game."

In any event, there's very little controversy among "the gaming public" about this topic in the first place (save for occasional message board posts like the ones in the preceding pages), and one should perhaps show respect for self-identification and community identification. Visual novels are sold as video games, they have CERO and ESRB ratings, they are developed for gaming consoles, they are sold on gaming websites like Steam, they are included in gaming databases like GameFAQs, profiled and reviewed by gaming websites, closely related to other gaming genres (RPGs, adventure games), and so on.

At this juncture, arguing that visual novels (and "walking simulators" I guess - I dunno what these are) aren't video games is a bit like arguing that something like golf isn't a "real sport." You could conjure pedantic definitions and flimsy arguments as to why it's so, but behaving in such an exclusive and stubborn manner really does nothing to benefit one's understanding of the gaming medium.
Segata wrote:DVD Menus are video games now by that vague definition from Webster.
Pure DVD (not DVD-ROM) video games have existed for some time now.
https://www.gamefaqs.com/dvd
User avatar
Segata
Next-Gen
Posts: 2498
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:19 pm

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by Segata »

Segata wrote:DVD Menus are video games now by that vague definition from Webster.
Pure DVD (not DVD-ROM) video games have existed for some time now.
https://www.gamefaqs.com/dvd[/quote]
I know. I was trolling on purpose..more or less mocking those who would say JRPGs are DVD menus. I have played Nu-On and some of my old DVD's have little games with them.
Image
Image
User avatar
Segata
Next-Gen
Posts: 2498
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:19 pm

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by Segata »

The fucking idiots who still think DMC fans hated DmC because of hair color. That was never really the issue. It was how NT called all DMC fans gay for liking it. Creating an inferior game when it came to writing, characters, and gameplay. A lot of the anger is at Capcom than NT. Capcom after DMC4 sold the best in the series and reviewed well. Decided to reboot it and expected the reboot to sell worse. WTF?! Capcom is just dumb at making decisions in general. Hair color was the last thing anyone was concerned with. It's like saying people hated Bionic Commando 2009 (not taking Re-armed as that game is awesome) because he had Dreadlocks. No, it wasn't liked because it just wasn't that great of a game and had an insanely dumb spoiler. His wife is his arm. Oh, people only hate SFV because Ken has Banana hair. While dumb looking the reason it failed and is disliked is missing content at launch. Capcom just has a thing for messing up success.

Am I still bitter about DmC? No. It failed & I think Capcom learned from it..for this franchise at least. Real Dante has been brought back in PXZ2 and Marvel vs Cacpom Infinite, so it seems Capcom got the message. There have been rumors for a while DMC5 is in talks to be developed. The Dante VA I think leaked about a year or so ago... Even if I never get a DMC 5. I got Bayonetta games and Platinum is around to still deliver their signature action in multiple games.
Image
Image
AppleQueso

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by AppleQueso »

I mean sure but just sayin classic dante was hot and new dante looks like someone who'd get fired from his convenience store for stealing snacks.
User avatar
ElkinFencer10
Next-Gen
Posts: 8960
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Elkin, North Carolina
Contact:

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by ElkinFencer10 »

Classic Dante was a boss; new Dante is a tryhard edgelord who looks like a mid-2000s emo kid. So basically me in middle school.
Patron Saint of Bitch Mode
User avatar
alienjesus
Next-Gen
Posts: 8875
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by alienjesus »

I'm playing the first game now. Classic Dante is also a tryhard edgelord.
Image
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by isiolia »

alienjesus wrote:I'm playing the first game now. Classic Dante is also a tryhard edgelord.
Yeah, I was gonna say...
User avatar
PartridgeSenpai
Next-Gen
Posts: 3173
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:27 am
Location: Northern Japan

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by PartridgeSenpai »

alienjesus wrote:I'm playing the first game now. Classic Dante is also a tryhard edgelord.
I laughed SO freaking hard when I watched the opening cutscene to the first game a couple years back XD . I'm waiting until I can get a good deal on the HD trilogy to try them again though (as I no longer have those PS2 copies).
Segata wrote:DVD Menus are video games now by that vague definition from Webster.
While you may jest, that is one of the measuring sticks I go by. I don't call most visual novels video games, because in my opinion they aren't. They're visual novels, and that's a perfectly accurate descriptor for them. Granted it does vary from VN to VN.

I'm not just trying to pick fights here, but hear me out on my reasoning. My key issue with calling some VN's and "walking simulators" (we really need a better term for them) is calling them a video "game." You can ostensibly lose a game. If something like a DVD-menu is just a series of clicks to experience a story, that is not a "game" so far as I see it.

Accumulating more and more into a more specific term removes the connotations for that word and makes it harder for speakers, (and more importantly, consumers) to make meaningful choices because the term begins to lack any concreteness. While both a tourist pamphlet and War & Peace may fall under the umbrella of "printed media," I'd be hard pressed to call that pamphlet a book, because the type of content and experience it provides compared to a book is so radically different. Similarly, I would argue that a DVD-menu is not a video game in the same way Asteroids is a video game. While games can exist on a DVD, that is not a DVD-menu. DVD-menu is not a genre the same way Action games are a genre. While they do both fall under "digital media," calling them both video games makes it needlessly more difficult to properly understand the content of both.

I have a very similar issue with how some people confuse the definitions of "rogue-like" vs. a "rogue-lite." Binding of Isaac may be a rogue-lite, but it is nothing like the game Rogue. Rogue-like has a very well defined meaning that was established many years ago. Rogue-lite is a term that the game Rogue Legacy invented that happens to work very well to describe many more recent game like Isaac, Ziggurat, etc. that are real-time action games with procedurally generated elements, perma-death, and some element of persistent progress.
I identify everyone via avatar, so if you change your avatar, I genuinely might completely forget who you are. -- Me
User avatar
alienjesus
Next-Gen
Posts: 8875
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by alienjesus »

PartridgeSenpai wrote:You can ostensibly lose a game. If something like a DVD-menu is just a series of clicks to experience a story, that is not a "game" so far as I see it.
When kids are playing cops and robbers or mums and dads or whatever, that is a game. It does not have a lose condition.
Image
User avatar
isiolia
Next-Gen
Posts: 5785
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: "gamer logic" nonsense that annoys you

Post by isiolia »

alienjesus wrote: When kids are playing cops and robbers or mums and dads or whatever, that is a game. It does not have a lose condition.
Perhaps, but if you stuck a box of GI Joes and Barbies in a box and called it a board game you'd probably have some folks disagree with the label too.

It's likely, in part, a product of how many other video game have developed. Role playing in general (as playing cops and robbers might be) doesn't have to involve stats and combat, but the origins of computer role playing games focus on that a lot. The focus may eventually shift, similar to how fewer and fewer games seem to make high scores a thing, but even then the stat-centric games will likely still persist under some label.
Post Reply