Tanooki wrote:Just for sake of argument here, pretend we do find this information and it backs him up completely that in his part of Sweden (if not nationally if that were found too) that since they started allowing in migrants from the middle east hot spots that various crimes have gone on a rise and correlate to those populations of people disproportionately causing those crimes? What would you argue then? If the data were there to back up his claim it's not a pretty picture you couldn't deny.
Well, I read the article from Fox and it looks like the one community that is being so hard-hit is Malmo, and it says the population is 32% migrants. Sweden may not be doing a good job spreading the migrants around throughout the country. With that high a concentration of migrants the city may not have adequate jobs or support infrastructure, meaning there may be a lot of economic and social pressure on those migrants. Being in a modern, 1st world nation is great and all, but if you can't get a job and therefore can't participate in that modern society, you end up with modern-day slums. Just because Sweden has a problem linked to migrants doesn't mean that the migrants are necessarily the problem. If Sweden hasn't taken the right steps to support the migrants they agreed to take, that can create all sorts of problems. It isn't easy to take in lots of migrants and resettle them. You have to be committed to it. (IMO, given how much war we've waged in the middle east, we have an obligation to be committed to accepting middle-eastern migrants and resettling them.)
The Fox article, and the officer's tweet, and Trump's impulse word barf don't give us enough information to really know where the problem is.