Spoiled brat women break Star Wars geek's shit.

Post by **Mozgus** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:20 pm

Ugh...

Star Wars geeks have their own issues, but nothing like women are born with. Look at them degrade to the mentalities of 10 year olds. They always seem to smash a man's property because they're unable to solve the "issue" otherwise. What goes on in their heads when they do this kind of thing? Do they imagine the guy will come back home, see his broken possession, and collapse in a spiritual breakthrough and forever be a more loving and ideal mate? When do you hear about a man destroying a woman's shit when she does something he doesn't approve of? The most he does is posts her nudes online, and that's generally only after the relationship is completely over. Women just have some kind of natural instinct to break down in a raging tantrum and smash what they do not like.

Post by **racketboy** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:31 pm

At least they didn't take out the arcade cabinet....

While I do think it's pretty low of them to do that, I also think its lame that he has all that and didn't get a ring.
Honestly, if you're in that situation, you shouldn't be getting married.
And people wonder why the divorce rate is so high....

Post by **Mozgus** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:46 pm

racketboy wrote:At least they didn't take out the arcade cabinet....

While I do think it's pretty low of them to do that, I also think its lame that he has all that and didn't get a ring.
Honestly, if you're in that situation, you shouldn't be getting married.
And people wonder why the divorce rate is so high....

The woman KNEW who he was before getting engaged with him. She just now decided she didn't approve of his interests? Bullshit. Besides, why do men still have to buy a woman's ring in this day and age? Equal rights, equal responsibilities. Get a job and buy your own god damn ring. Marriage is a group effort, and so should the engagement be.

Also, do you doubt that she herself has collections of worthless bullshit as well? Women are so much more proficient at hoarding worthless objects. I'll bet you she has more fashion accessories than he has storm troopers.

Post by **fastbilly1** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:30 am

Cab looks like it is in a step above poor shape - but it could just be the lighting.

If that speederbike is the one I think it is we are talking $400-500 back in 97. I dont even want to think of the value now.

Both have justified reasons for being angry, but destroying ones property is a unique way to show the one you want to marry a lesson. She should have just asked him not to go to Vegas. Her action, while justified, can be constitued as an act of petty larceny in many states. If he really was as obsessed with the model as she claims he was, there may be a lawsuit on the horizon.

Granted due to the internet this could all just be staged for shock value.

Post by **latenitevacancy** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:01 am

i agree with this claim of shock value.

either way, it was really stupid and petty. and reminds me of my ex-girlfriend. while she never destroyed anything of mine, i know she definitely wasnt above it. she, like the woman in this video had the mentality of a 10 year old

Post by **Ivo** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:24 am

racketboy wrote:At least they didn't take out the arcade cabinet....

I like the way you think

More seriously now, Moz, generalizations tend to not stand on their own. Not all women are "much more proficient at hoarding worthless objects" (although I know what you are talking about with the fashion accessories, there is an arguably large percentage of women that fall into that camp of "obsessed with shoes / purses / whatever".

And some men (and I'm certain, a few women) instead of destroying the other person's property, go for the physical integrity. Perhaps not quite like "10 year old mentality", but certainly worse in my opinion.

Ivo.

Post by **racketboy** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:44 am

Mozgus wrote:
racketboy wrote:At least they didn't take out the arcade cabinet....

While I do think it's pretty low of them to do that, I also think its lame that he has all that and didn't get a ring.
Honestly, if you're in that situation, you shouldn't be getting married.
And people wonder why the divorce rate is so high....
The woman KNEW who he was before getting engaged with him. She just now decided she didn't approve of his interests? Bullshit. Besides, why do men still have to buy a woman's ring in this day and age? Equal rights, equal responsibilities. Get a job and buy your own god damn ring. Marriage is a group effort, and so should the engagement be.

Also, do you doubt that she herself has collections of worthless bullshit as well? Women are so much more proficient at hoarding worthless objects. I'll bet you she has more fashion accessories than he has storm troopers.

Very true.

Post by **Mozgus** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:22 am

Ivo wrote:More seriously now, Moz, generalizations tend to not stand on their own.

Generalizations are great ammo. They work for me. I wouldn't use them if I saw any evidence they weren't true. No reason to lie to myself.

Post by **Droid party** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:42 am

Wow. Women can be such bitches. I think I just turned gay.

Post by **arion** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:58 am

that was just too hard to look at