Forget her.
In her new movie THE CHANGE UP, she had her nipples cgi'd in. And not like some cool Kuato effect, she just covered her boobs and had the studio add the shape of her boobs and nipples. I see a new and horrible trend coming to Hollywood. The illusions are bad enough, and the boobs are already fake enough; now they're cgi'ing chicks who are already smoking hot.
This stinks.
Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
So what?
Like it's your right to see their boobs or something. If they don't want to do nudity, they don't want to do it.
Like it's your right to see their boobs or something. If they don't want to do nudity, they don't want to do it.
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
Oh well.irixith wrote:So what?
Like it's your right to see their boobs or something. If they don't want to do nudity, they don't want to do it.
If I hired someone for XMillion dollars and a shot called for nudity, I would expect the person I hired to fulfill the contract, and not have to spend another xnumber of dollars to cgi it in. She pulled the same shit in C&Aliens. She was supposed to have a shot of her can, and she refused during the shoot after already agreeing to it.
-
Gamerforlife
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 10184
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
It's about being phony. Either she gonna show what's she got or not. Not that I care really, but I see Luke's point
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
- s1mplehumar
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5143
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 2:26 pm
- Location: Ragol (FORREST 1)
- Contact:
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
I agree.irixith wrote:So what?
Like it's your right to see their boobs or something. If they don't want to do nudity, they don't want to do it.
I don't know if she reneged on her contract or whatever, but a little modesty in Hollywood is welcome. Still, CGI ta tas are just a substitute. The reasoning is just irrational to me.
Nintendo ID, PSN, XBL: Eronnicus * Steam ID: s1mplehumar * Switch Friend Code: SW-3270-7921-5525
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
Who? Is she that totally unfunny marginally attractive part time Daily Show correspondent?
Nudity in film had a point, back in the 80s before porn was everywhere. These days, who cares?
Nudity in film had a point, back in the 80s before porn was everywhere. These days, who cares?
We are prepared to live in the plain and die in the plain!
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
She did.s1mplehumar wrote:
I agree.
I don't know if she reneged on her contract or whatever...
It's like if Jet Li said to a director "I have second thoughts about these kung-fu scenes. Just cgi them in. I'll be in my trailer".
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
Who? Couldn't care, nudity often an unnecessary boredom anyway. If the movie does have CGI, make it look like it does not have CGI.
Didn't 300 have CGI to buff up the warriors bellys?
Didn't 300 have CGI to buff up the warriors bellys?
CRT vs LCD - Hardware Mods - HDAdvance - Custom Controllers - Game Storage - Wii Gamecube and other Guides:
CRTGAMER Guides in Board Guides Index: http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p1109425
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
Still does. In movies and in television, and it's not all about the nudity itself, it's also about showing a character's status/fragility/insecurities/sexuality.Hatta wrote: Nudity in film had a point, back in the 80s before porn was everywhere. These days, who cares?
Re: Boycott Olivia "not at all" Wilde
CRTGAMER wrote:Who? Couldn't care, nudity often an unnecessary boredom anyway. If the movie does have CGI, make it look like it does not have CGI.
Didn't 300 have CGI to buff up the warriors bellys?
There were actual people in 300?