And a rating system isn't going to keep people from seeing it any more than it kept Playboy magazines and horror movies away from determined kids in the past. A parent talking to their kid to prepare and keeping watch is still the best IMHO.BurningDoom wrote: Yeah, that's great and all, but that's not a rating system. Something that's easily identifiable like movie ratings. Some parents may not care about something like graphic violence, while others do.
If it's done that way nothing is outlawed, but at the same time there's something there to protect the children. I in no way, shape, or form support outlawing such sites (or porn sites) completely.
Anonymous again
- Hobie-wan
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 21705
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
- Contact:
Re: Anonymous again
I've never met a pun I didn't like. - Stark
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
- BurningDoom
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:14 am
Re: Anonymous again
Well no duh. Of course there's gonna be kids that will still get to it. The same thing applies to all those things adults aren't supposed to have, as well. Doesn't mean the rating system wouldn't help, though. There are still good parents out there that would pay attention, and this would make it easier for them. And for those parents that don't give a crap, nothing changes for them.Hobie-wan wrote:And a rating system isn't going to keep people from seeing it any more than it kept Playboy magazines and horror movies away from determined kids in the past. A parent talking to their kid to prepare and keeping watch is still the best IMHO.BurningDoom wrote: Yeah, that's great and all, but that's not a rating system. Something that's easily identifiable like movie ratings. Some parents may not care about something like graphic violence, while others do.
If it's done that way nothing is outlawed, but at the same time there's something there to protect the children. I in no way, shape, or form support outlawing such sites (or porn sites) completely.
Game Trade/Want List:
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=28206
Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 22&t=28206
Consoles Owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, Super GB, N64, Gamecube, GB Player, Wii, Sega Power Base Converter, Genesis, Saturn, Dreamcast, TurboGrafx-16, PlayStation, PS2 Slim, XBox, XBox 360, Game Boy, GBC, GBA-SP, DS, Game Gear, GG Master Converter
-
DinnerX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
- Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge
Re: Anonymous again
I don't think it's the government's business. Something voluntary like the ESRB would be OK I guess.BurningDoom wrote: Well no duh. Of course there's gonna be kids that will still get to it. The same thing applies to all those things adults aren't supposed to have, as well. Doesn't mean the rating system wouldn't help, though. There are still good parents out there that would pay attention, and this would make it easier for them.
I gotta say though, for most sites it's fairly obvious what they are for.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.
Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.