No, because the conversation didn't happen the way you mention. Even tough it has been quoted several times, you ignore the part where he answers Hatta.irixith wrote:Does it now make sense? You're taking one post in a conversation and taking it way out of context.
This is Luke's post in it's enterity:
As it's clearn, he is talking with Hatta about "why is nudity important in film". He is not talking about this film in particular here.Luke wrote:Still does. In movies and in television, and it's not all about the nudity itself, it's also about showing a character's status/fragility/insecurities/sexuality.Hatta wrote: Nudity in film had a point, back in the 80s before porn was everywhere. These days, who cares?
You then proceeded to quote the above post and say:
Tell me, what is this but an accusation? Why do you even ask this? Why "only when it's a woman"? Why talk about gender?irixith wrote:..but only when it's a woman, right?
Because you were calling him on a supposed double standard. No more, no less.
Also, that you do not find comedy a suitable genre for exploring sexuality, insecurities, fragility or just a character's status makes me a sad panda.
