Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
Stark
Next-Gen
Posts: 9585
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:43 pm
Location: Wylie, TX

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by Stark »

I would have trouble voting for anyone named Jeb.
Let strength be granted, so the world might be mended...so the world might be mended.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by BoringSupreez »

People didn't have trouble electing a guy named Zachary.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
ninjainspandex
Next-Gen
Posts: 4574
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: Hartland Wisconsin

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by ninjainspandex »

Stark wrote:I would have trouble voting for anyone named Jeb.
ya cuz people have trouble voting people with goofy names....
Image
User avatar
flex wood
Next-Gen
Posts: 2695
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:53 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by flex wood »

Luke wrote:
flex wood wrote:
Zing wrote:I am convinced that even if Iran provided "proof", it would not be satisfactory.
This. A thousand times this.
I believe the last thing Obama wants is to destabilize the region any further.
Fixed
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24194
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by MrPopo »

BoringSupreez wrote:People didn't have trouble electing a guy named Zachary.
It was a different time.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by Luke »

MrPopo wrote:
BoringSupreez wrote:People didn't have trouble electing a guy named Zachary.
It was a different time.
Yeah, but didn't Zach beat Jessie for class President in the 90's?
dsheinem
Next-Gen
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by dsheinem »

Luke wrote:
Stark wrote: Wouldn't it be Bush 3? :roll:

Sometimes I think Jeb would make the republican party look less goofy.
That's an extremely sad - and true - commentary on the status of the Republican party :lol:
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by Luke »

dsheinem wrote:
Luke wrote:
Stark wrote: Wouldn't it be Bush 3? :roll:

Sometimes I think Jeb would make the republican party look less goofy.
That's an extremely sad - and true - commentary on the status of the Republican party :lol:

What bothers me is that I'm being 100% honest when I say that.

I need to research if: more campaign$ spent=being elected.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by BoringSupreez »

Luke wrote:
dsheinem wrote:
Luke wrote:Sometimes I think Jeb would make the republican party look less goofy.
That's an extremely sad - and true - commentary on the status of the Republican party :lol:

What bothers me is that I'm being 100% honest when I say that.

I need to research if: more campaign$ spent=being elected.
I don't think it always works that way. I could be wrong, but I think Democrat presidential candidates usually get more money than the Republican, regardless of which one wins.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
Zing
Next-Gen
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Presidential Address, March 6th 2012

Post by Zing »

Believe it or not, Iran is a sovereign nation, and doesn't need to show the USA anything. Imagine if Russia demanded to see "proof" of USA nuclear activities.

I also don't see the USA pressuring Israel to admit they have nuclear weapons or allow inspections. It's an open secret, and there is more proof of clandestine acts there than anyone has even falsified against Iran so far. Where are the IAEA inspectors?

The UN narrowly passed a resolution in 2009 asking the IAEA to inspect Israel's nuclear facilities and potential. How did Israel respond? "Israel will not cooperate in any matter with this resolution which is only aiming at reinforcing political hostilities and lines of division in the Middle East region."

So Israel openly refuses to allow any inspections. Not only that, but they state that inspections of this kind just increase hostilities in the region. Kind of hypocritical that Israel is demanding Iran allow inspections and threatening war if they don't.
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
Post Reply