Gambling > video a magmingMrPopo wrote:Priorities, man!
Climbing trees > vidja gamin
Gambling in a tree house > sexy time
Gambling > video a magmingMrPopo wrote:Priorities, man!
My answers:Erik_Twice wrote:We spent a lot of time arguing about what counts as "beating" a game some time ago but we haven't really discussed how we approach that in the first place! Think of this as the philosophical counterpart to the Games Beaten thread or a general rant place for anything related to beating games.
Some questions to kickstarter a conversation:![]()
1) Do you have problems focusing enough on a game to beat it?
2) Other than losing interest, is there any recurring reason why you abandon games?
3) Conversely, is there something that makes you far more likely to beat a game?
4) Do you finish bad games or games you are not enjoying too much?
5) Have you ever tried to beat a whole series? Which one? Did you succeed? (Falcom hates him! You won't believe the series BoneSnapDeez will beat next!)
Bonus X) What's the game that required more effort from you to beat?
Bonus Y) What game you would really love to beat but won't for the foreseeable future?
Bonux Z) Aren't you ashamed when you open your Steam library? Shaaaame![]()
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
You should toss the shovelware and games you don't like/don't want to play even if they're critically acclaimed. Shovelware was the first to go for me, and I was proud for having no bad games. Next went the games I just didn't want to play/didn't like, regardless of their stature. A smaller library of games I like is better than a larger, mixed-bag collection of games.Ack wrote:I suppose this is a good time to mention that I find myself focusing specifically on particular hardware. Like I have been putting off playing much of my collection because my focus these days is strictly SNES and PC. At this point, that is all I collect as well, and the rate of collecting for my SNES has slowed a fair bit. There is a combination of reasons for this, from space concerns to money to my evolving views on having a collection in general. I've even mentally toyed with selling off parts of it that just no longer interest me.
Yeah... I could honestly do without 80% of my 360 collection or something. That was around the time I was doing Gamefly for a bit, couldn't help but "keep it" for almost every rental and was way too into the AAA craze early on that gen. Since then is when I've realized it's better to be more selective about your choices, not in a limiting way, but there's just tons of games out there I know I don't need to bother with. The 360 library I built up is a specific target, because there's just no way I'll care to replay most of the games I have for it.o.pwuaioc wrote:You should toss the shovelware and games you don't like/don't want to play even if they're critically acclaimed. Shovelware was the first to go for me, and I was proud for having no bad games. Next went the games I just didn't want to play/didn't like, regardless of their stature. A smaller library of games I like is better than a larger, mixed-bag collection of games.Ack wrote:I suppose this is a good time to mention that I find myself focusing specifically on particular hardware. Like I have been putting off playing much of my collection because my focus these days is strictly SNES and PC. At this point, that is all I collect as well, and the rate of collecting for my SNES has slowed a fair bit. There is a combination of reasons for this, from space concerns to money to my evolving views on having a collection in general. I've even mentally toyed with selling off parts of it that just no longer interest me.