What's the deal?

Gaming on the Playstation and Xbox Platforms
EvilRyu2099
Next-Gen
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 9:59 am
Location: Street Fighter Alpha 2 and 3

Re: What's the deal?

Post by EvilRyu2099 »

flamepanther wrote:]Sony had some options here as far as motivation, not all of which were evil. For example:

NOT EVIL: Wanting to compete with Nintendo in order to prove they could stand on their own in the gaming business.

NOT EVIL: Wanting to compete with Nintendo in order to justify and recoup their losses from research and development on the original project.

EVIL: Wanting to compete with Nintendo due to personal feelings of rage, to act out revenge for bruised egos.


Sony considered options 1 & 2, but rejected them. They liked option 3. What Would Vader Do?
I don't think they totally acted out of revenge.. They were angered that they were wronged but ultimately Kutaragi wanted to start a stand alone console.. He asked the CEO of Sony to make one prior and after Nintendo screwed them he finally budged..
Image
PSN: GoTigers9999
Live: Iori8000
Nintendo:Iori9999 3DS Friend Code: 4012-3366-0941
My Twitch stream channel!
User avatar
flamepanther
Next-Gen
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:40 pm

Re: What's the deal?

Post by flamepanther »

EvilRyu2099 wrote:I don't think they totally acted out of revenge.. They were angered that they were wronged but ultimately Kutaragi wanted to start a stand alone console.. He asked the CEO of Sony to make one prior and after Nintendo screwed them he finally budged..
That's the thing though. He only budged after Kutaragi appealed to his sense of anger and revenge. All of the other reasons weren't enough, but hatred was the deciding factor. There's not an honest way to gloss over that. Kutaragi's original intentions may not have been evil, but neither were Anakin Skywalker's ;)

What I find odd is that you keep pointing out the apparent injustice of Nintendo screwing Sony, when it was Sony that initially wanted to screw Nintendo. By the same rationale, shouldn't that have made Nintendo's move justified in the first place? I'm not saying that it entirely was justified, but the logic I'm seeing here seems a little circular.
Image
User avatar
jfrost
Next-Gen
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: What's the deal?

Post by jfrost »

I think it's awesome that the PlayStation was born out of feelings of revenge. All other consoles are supposed to be "fun". And when the competition is deemed a "kiddie console", they don't like it!
Limewater
Next-Gen
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Northern Alabama

Re: What's the deal?

Post by Limewater »

jfrost wrote:I think it's awesome that the PlayStation was born out of feelings of revenge. All other consoles are supposed to be "fun". And when the competition is deemed a "kiddie console", they don't like it!
Yeah, I wouldn't hold the revenge angle against Sony at all. I would, however, hold the name against Sony. I've always thought that "PlayStation" sounded more like something you would buy a toddler than a serious game console. It seems they were very successful anyway.
Systems: TI-99/4a, Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, NES, SMS, GB, Neo Geo MVS (Big Red 4-slot), Genesis, SNES, 3DO, PS1, N64, DC, PS2, GBA, GCN, NDSi, Wii
Post Reply