Cost of Living

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
aaron
Next-Gen
Posts: 7139
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Cost of Living

Post by aaron »

take a look at sunny indianapolis, sittin pretty on short staxx.

http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/02/2 ... -who-knew/

circle city ftw, booyah.

Image
Steam / PSN / Twitter: aaronjohnmiller
dedalusdedalus
Next-Gen
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 9:38 pm

Re: Cost of Living

Post by dedalusdedalus »

GSZX1337 wrote:What do you guys think about Certificates of Deposit (CDs)? I've been thinking about investing in one of those.
Bad idea. You'd essentially be running in place if you got those. Those yield like 1-2% per year. Inflation is generally equal to or greater than that, so you'd just be keeping pace with inflation if you're lucky. And the foreseeable future looks to be very inflationary.

I'm sure CDs have their uses, but "retirement investment" is not one of them.
User avatar
GSZX1337
Next-Gen
Posts: 5805
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Madison, TN

Re: Cost of Living

Post by GSZX1337 »

aaron wrote:circle city ftw, booyah.
*derails thread*
Am I the only one that really hates it when someone says "booyah"? It doesn't really bother me much in text, though.
dedalusdedalus wrote:Bad idea. You'd essentially be running in place if you got those. Those yield like 1-2% per year. Inflation is generally equal to or greater than that, so you'd just be keeping pace with inflation if you're lucky. And inflation looks to be high the next couple of years.

I'm sure CDs have their uses, but "retirement investment" is not one of them.
Shit, my Personal Financing Class lied to me. I could've sworn that the return was 5-10%.
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24198
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Cost of Living

Post by MrPopo »

GSZX1337 wrote:Shit, my Personal Financing Class lied to me. I could've sworn that the return was 5-10%.
In my experience the return on CDs is only a half point to a point higher than the return on a savings account, but your funds are locked in. Really, if you want to start retirement planning you should look into an IRA or consider investing in a mutual fund long-term.
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Pulsar_t
Next-Gen
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:38 am

Re: Cost of Living

Post by Pulsar_t »

Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growth :lol: Not wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
Thy ban hammer shalt strike Image
Limewater
Next-Gen
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Northern Alabama

Re: Cost of Living

Post by Limewater »

GSZX1337 wrote: Shit, my Personal Financing Class lied to me. I could've sworn that the return was 5-10%.
Either they lied or you were mistaken in your recollection. A few years ago, the best CDs were giving in the neighborhood of 4.5%. Today, you're doing really well to break 2%. Fortunately (in my opinion), I think we're currently in a period of deflation, though I think there's going to be some crazy inflation on the horizon.

CDs are good for money you expect to need soon. They aren't volatile like stock or mutual funds. My wife and I keep a lot in CDs right now because we're planning on buying a house fairly soon and want to make a decent down payment.

But yeah, as a retirement vehicle, CDs suck.
Systems: TI-99/4a, Commodore Vic-20, Atari 2600, NES, SMS, GB, Neo Geo MVS (Big Red 4-slot), Genesis, SNES, 3DO, PS1, N64, DC, PS2, GBA, GCN, NDSi, Wii
User avatar
Octopod
Next-Gen
Posts: 2653
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Cost of Living

Post by Octopod »

Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growth :lol: Not wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.

I agree with this. We can not continue to increase our population at the rate we currently are.

I have one kid and that is enough.

Of course people will get all butthurt about other people telling them they can't do something, but whatever.
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24198
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Cost of Living

Post by MrPopo »

Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growth :lol: Not wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
<insert remark about Malthus here>
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
DerekG52
32-bit
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:45 am

Re: Cost of Living

Post by DerekG52 »

Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growth :lol: Not wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
Don't be so sure that those things you mentioned won't happen... There are plenty of doomsday scenarios that can cause any of those situations, global warming (if it's true, there will be massive desert growth), wars fought over increasingly scarce resources, and the ever present threat of new or evolving germs to kill us off. If there was one thing that humans are good at its killing each other.

E: Back to financials, CDs will typically always be a poor investment choice because they are typically limited to a small premium over the fed rate. It makes sense if you were able to time the trends of interest rates, I had some longer term CDs until recently that were still around 5%. Interest rates will be rising, it remains to be seen what inflation does.

I am almost not a fan of mutual funds, they typically have so many holdings you would be better off just having an ETF that mirrors the market as a whole. Also they tend to have higher expenses related to them which cuts into your long term gains. Examples you could use are SPY or DIA which mirror the S&P and Dow respectively. Of course you need to thing long term (min 5 years) if you want to buy money into the market. If you need this sort of cash for a short term purchase keep it elsewhere.

If you are looking for something relatively safer, you could consider TIPS (Treasury Inflated Protected Securities) that will typically pay something on the lines of inflation % + 2%. They are typically backed with the full faith of the us govt, TIPS is an example ticker.

Disclaimer: I own none of these so I am not looking for any sort of boost in my wealth from your purchase.
Image
Image
dedalusdedalus
Next-Gen
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 9:38 pm

Re: Cost of Living

Post by dedalusdedalus »

Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growth :lol: Not wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
I'm going to continue to derail the thread with you. I completely agree that this world needs to curb population growth because--barring significant increases in food yield like in the agricultural revolution--the human population is bound for Malthusian deadlock.

Of course, taking any action is going to be a problem. What China did to limit its own population growth will pay dividends to the rest of the world, because those unborn Chinese children won't be eating or polluting, but it's really going to cost China sometime down the road. Because of the one child policy, China at some point is going to have a very old population with relatively few citizens who are young enough to be productive.

So this is the classic "problem of the commons": population control is needed for the good of the entire world, but bad for the individual state actors. Therefore, it's extremely hard to take the collective action needed to solve the problem.
Last edited by dedalusdedalus on Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply