http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/02/2 ... -who-knew/
circle city ftw, booyah.


Bad idea. You'd essentially be running in place if you got those. Those yield like 1-2% per year. Inflation is generally equal to or greater than that, so you'd just be keeping pace with inflation if you're lucky. And the foreseeable future looks to be very inflationary.GSZX1337 wrote:What do you guys think about Certificates of Deposit (CDs)? I've been thinking about investing in one of those.
*derails thread*aaron wrote:circle city ftw, booyah.
Shit, my Personal Financing Class lied to me. I could've sworn that the return was 5-10%.dedalusdedalus wrote:Bad idea. You'd essentially be running in place if you got those. Those yield like 1-2% per year. Inflation is generally equal to or greater than that, so you'd just be keeping pace with inflation if you're lucky. And inflation looks to be high the next couple of years.
I'm sure CDs have their uses, but "retirement investment" is not one of them.
casterofdreams wrote:On PC I want MOAR FPS!!!|
In my experience the return on CDs is only a half point to a point higher than the return on a savings account, but your funds are locked in. Really, if you want to start retirement planning you should look into an IRA or consider investing in a mutual fund long-term.GSZX1337 wrote:Shit, my Personal Financing Class lied to me. I could've sworn that the return was 5-10%.

Either they lied or you were mistaken in your recollection. A few years ago, the best CDs were giving in the neighborhood of 4.5%. Today, you're doing really well to break 2%. Fortunately (in my opinion), I think we're currently in a period of deflation, though I think there's going to be some crazy inflation on the horizon.GSZX1337 wrote: Shit, my Personal Financing Class lied to me. I could've sworn that the return was 5-10%.
Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growthNot wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
<insert remark about Malthus here>Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growthNot wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
Don't be so sure that those things you mentioned won't happen... There are plenty of doomsday scenarios that can cause any of those situations, global warming (if it's true, there will be massive desert growth), wars fought over increasingly scarce resources, and the ever present threat of new or evolving germs to kill us off. If there was one thing that humans are good at its killing each other.Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growthNot wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.
I'm going to continue to derail the thread with you. I completely agree that this world needs to curb population growth because--barring significant increases in food yield like in the agricultural revolution--the human population is bound for Malthusian deadlock.Pulsar_t wrote:Is inflation going to curb world population growth, or are people going to procreate anyway? With no major wars, famines or plagues to keep human numbers in check people should look into progressive methods to redress some balance. I wonder whether China was right about limiting families to one offspring? And then you have countries with negative population growthNot wishing to derail this topic but it seems raising nuclear families is becoming an increasingly unfeasible option.