Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
User avatar
MrPopo
Moderator
Posts: 24190
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by MrPopo »

Did anyone else notice that it looks like they modified the cargo bay of the Serenity for the cargo bay of the plane?
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by Luke »

Keep in mind that it is a PILOT.

The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.

A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").

They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
User avatar
Ack
Moderator
Posts: 22573
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by Ack »

Luke wrote:Keep in mind that it is a PILOT.

The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.

A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").

They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
No Kirk. Scully had long hair. Father Mulcahy was played by a completely different actor.
Image
fastbilly1
Site Admin
Posts: 13775
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by fastbilly1 »

Luke wrote:Keep in mind that it is a PILOT.

The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.

A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").

They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
Close, but this is a BROADCAST pilot not a PRODUCTION pilot like the Full House example. Being a broadcast pilot means they already have the cast down and have invested in atleast a few episodes (typically four to six). So if the show does not pick up soon it may end up as a partially told story, like Drive or Clerks the Animated Series. That said, the second episode will be the real tell. Over 12 million watched the pilot, and if they can keep those numbers, well it will keep going.
User avatar
Luke
Next-Gen
Posts: 21076
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by Luke »

You knew what I was throwing down.

But yeah, a pilot is a litmus test for interest.

Besides a few exceptions (JOEY) most pilots do not reflect the show it will become.
fastbilly1
Site Admin
Posts: 13775
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by fastbilly1 »

Oh I picked it up and then put it back on the shelf.

Like I said, I am curious to what happens. But the similarities to the Global Frequency pilot are to ripe for jokes.
User avatar
d123456
Next-Gen
Posts: 1268
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: The Netherlands, Almere
Contact:

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by d123456 »

HuGe fan of Firefly, best sci fi show ever hands down.
Hearing that Joss did it, I must say I am disappointed.
You see the jokes coming a mile away.
Can't put my finger on it, but something is off. Also that 'cloned?' guy is suddenly a terrible actor. The script is ridiculous. The dialog is just weird and bad.
I'd give it, based on the pilot, a 5 stars out of 10.
just, WHY did they make this? What is the reason? I see no passion in the product, just terrible cliches. I guess it can only get better. Where's Nick Fury?
Optimizing PS2 games 480p (progressive) and 240p gsm hdtv
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 25&t=30389
Gamerforlife
Next-Gen
Posts: 10184
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by Gamerforlife »

I seemed to enjoy it more than most of you. I'll say this though...

A lot of Whedon fans I've talked to are of the opinion that neither Dollhouse, Buffy, or Angel started out great. So this is typical Whedon. His shows usually take a little while to get going, but eventually become fantastic. In the case of Dollhouse though, that was mostly Fox's fault, not his.

But going with the Buffy and Angel examples, it usually takes a while for him to find his footing. Plus, he typically lays down a lot of foundations for big pay offs later. Obviously we all want to know about that Coulson/Tahiti thing. A lot of people will tell you that Angel starting getting really good towards the end of its first season, but was pretty aimless before that. Season 2 was stellar. A lot of fans actually think Buffy's first season was crap, but will rave about seasons 2 and 3 and 5.

Some of my other favorite shows are the same way. I love Nikita, and its brilliance started to show near the end of season 1 and it's been pretty consistently good ever since. Supernatural is a show I think got progressively better each season until it peaked in season 5. Not every show can be Breaking Bad, which has pretty much always been amazing and seems on track to have an amazing series finale too.

I'd rather a show start out slow and get better. The reverse of that leaves us with something like...Heroes. Ugh, what a mess that show became.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
User avatar
Cronozilla
Next-Gen
Posts: 2609
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:15 pm
Location: Oregon, USA.

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by Cronozilla »

I'll be honest, I hated Dollhouse. There was a lot of promise there and very little delivery. And the overarcing plot threads, while interesting, weren't enough to hold the series up. Yeah, there was a lot of meddling, but I feel like it never became that great show people claim it is.
Gamerforlife
Next-Gen
Posts: 10184
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Post by Gamerforlife »

Cronozilla wrote:I'll be honest, I hated Dollhouse. There was a lot of promise there and very little delivery. And the overarcing plot threads, while interesting, weren't enough to hold the series up. Yeah, there was a lot of meddling, but I feel like it never became that great show people claim it is.
They had to dumb a lot of things down to please the network. I think that show would have fared better on an AMC, HBO, or Showtime. I think Joss wanted to explore darker and more sexual themes than Fox was comfortable with. Dollhouse just wasn't meant for network TV in my opinion. Even in season 2 when it felt like Joss was getting some more creative control, a lot of irreparable damage had already been done to the show by Fox. Joss always spoke well of them though. Guess there's no sense in burning bridges
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
Post Reply