Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
Did anyone else notice that it looks like they modified the cargo bay of the Serenity for the cargo bay of the plane?
Blizzard Entertainment Software Developer - All comments and views are my own and not representative of the company.
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
Keep in mind that it is a PILOT.
The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.
A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").
They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.
A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").
They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
No Kirk. Scully had long hair. Father Mulcahy was played by a completely different actor.Luke wrote:Keep in mind that it is a PILOT.
The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.
A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").
They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
-
fastbilly1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13775
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
Close, but this is a BROADCAST pilot not a PRODUCTION pilot like the Full House example. Being a broadcast pilot means they already have the cast down and have invested in atleast a few episodes (typically four to six). So if the show does not pick up soon it may end up as a partially told story, like Drive or Clerks the Animated Series. That said, the second episode will be the real tell. Over 12 million watched the pilot, and if they can keep those numbers, well it will keep going.Luke wrote:Keep in mind that it is a PILOT.
The pilot for FULL HOUSE: No Bob Sagget.
A pilot is like a focus group on a larger scale. This is "Will anyone watch it and should we move forward?" stage (more importantly "will we get ad revenue with this?").
They threw out the bait and are now seeing what they caught. The pilot was supposed to appeal on a broad scope, and for how average it was, it will continue to hone its target audience.
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
You knew what I was throwing down.
But yeah, a pilot is a litmus test for interest.
Besides a few exceptions (JOEY) most pilots do not reflect the show it will become.
But yeah, a pilot is a litmus test for interest.
Besides a few exceptions (JOEY) most pilots do not reflect the show it will become.
-
fastbilly1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13775
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:08 pm
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
Oh I picked it up and then put it back on the shelf.
Like I said, I am curious to what happens. But the similarities to the Global Frequency pilot are to ripe for jokes.
Like I said, I am curious to what happens. But the similarities to the Global Frequency pilot are to ripe for jokes.
- d123456
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: The Netherlands, Almere
- Contact:
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
HuGe fan of Firefly, best sci fi show ever hands down.
Hearing that Joss did it, I must say I am disappointed.
You see the jokes coming a mile away.
Can't put my finger on it, but something is off. Also that 'cloned?' guy is suddenly a terrible actor. The script is ridiculous. The dialog is just weird and bad.
I'd give it, based on the pilot, a 5 stars out of 10.
just, WHY did they make this? What is the reason? I see no passion in the product, just terrible cliches. I guess it can only get better. Where's Nick Fury?
Hearing that Joss did it, I must say I am disappointed.
You see the jokes coming a mile away.
Can't put my finger on it, but something is off. Also that 'cloned?' guy is suddenly a terrible actor. The script is ridiculous. The dialog is just weird and bad.
I'd give it, based on the pilot, a 5 stars out of 10.
just, WHY did they make this? What is the reason? I see no passion in the product, just terrible cliches. I guess it can only get better. Where's Nick Fury?
Optimizing PS2 games 480p (progressive) and 240p gsm hdtv
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 25&t=30389
http://www.racketboy.com/forum/viewtopi ... 25&t=30389
-
Gamerforlife
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 10184
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
I seemed to enjoy it more than most of you. I'll say this though...
A lot of Whedon fans I've talked to are of the opinion that neither Dollhouse, Buffy, or Angel started out great. So this is typical Whedon. His shows usually take a little while to get going, but eventually become fantastic. In the case of Dollhouse though, that was mostly Fox's fault, not his.
But going with the Buffy and Angel examples, it usually takes a while for him to find his footing. Plus, he typically lays down a lot of foundations for big pay offs later. Obviously we all want to know about that Coulson/Tahiti thing. A lot of people will tell you that Angel starting getting really good towards the end of its first season, but was pretty aimless before that. Season 2 was stellar. A lot of fans actually think Buffy's first season was crap, but will rave about seasons 2 and 3 and 5.
Some of my other favorite shows are the same way. I love Nikita, and its brilliance started to show near the end of season 1 and it's been pretty consistently good ever since. Supernatural is a show I think got progressively better each season until it peaked in season 5. Not every show can be Breaking Bad, which has pretty much always been amazing and seems on track to have an amazing series finale too.
I'd rather a show start out slow and get better. The reverse of that leaves us with something like...Heroes. Ugh, what a mess that show became.
A lot of Whedon fans I've talked to are of the opinion that neither Dollhouse, Buffy, or Angel started out great. So this is typical Whedon. His shows usually take a little while to get going, but eventually become fantastic. In the case of Dollhouse though, that was mostly Fox's fault, not his.
But going with the Buffy and Angel examples, it usually takes a while for him to find his footing. Plus, he typically lays down a lot of foundations for big pay offs later. Obviously we all want to know about that Coulson/Tahiti thing. A lot of people will tell you that Angel starting getting really good towards the end of its first season, but was pretty aimless before that. Season 2 was stellar. A lot of fans actually think Buffy's first season was crap, but will rave about seasons 2 and 3 and 5.
Some of my other favorite shows are the same way. I love Nikita, and its brilliance started to show near the end of season 1 and it's been pretty consistently good ever since. Supernatural is a show I think got progressively better each season until it peaked in season 5. Not every show can be Breaking Bad, which has pretty much always been amazing and seems on track to have an amazing series finale too.
I'd rather a show start out slow and get better. The reverse of that leaves us with something like...Heroes. Ugh, what a mess that show became.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
- Cronozilla
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:15 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA.
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
I'll be honest, I hated Dollhouse. There was a lot of promise there and very little delivery. And the overarcing plot threads, while interesting, weren't enough to hold the series up. Yeah, there was a lot of meddling, but I feel like it never became that great show people claim it is.
-
Gamerforlife
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 10184
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
They had to dumb a lot of things down to please the network. I think that show would have fared better on an AMC, HBO, or Showtime. I think Joss wanted to explore darker and more sexual themes than Fox was comfortable with. Dollhouse just wasn't meant for network TV in my opinion. Even in season 2 when it felt like Joss was getting some more creative control, a lot of irreparable damage had already been done to the show by Fox. Joss always spoke well of them though. Guess there's no sense in burning bridgesCronozilla wrote:I'll be honest, I hated Dollhouse. There was a lot of promise there and very little delivery. And the overarcing plot threads, while interesting, weren't enough to hold the series up. Yeah, there was a lot of meddling, but I feel like it never became that great show people claim it is.
RyaNtheSlayA wrote:
Seriously. Screw you Shao Kahn I'm gonna play Animal Crossing.
