Beyond Good and Evil 2:)

Talk about just about anything else that is non-gaming here, but keep it clean
dudex77
32-bit
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: Netherlands

Post by dudex77 »

Apparently it went all casual. Basically if it comes out for PC in the end it'll be worth pirating but otherwise not for me
Image
User avatar
lordofduct
Next-Gen
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: West Palm Beach

Post by lordofduct »

Mozgus wrote:
lordofduct wrote:What's the new style? It looks like the old one to me, with better graphics and stuff.


unless you guys saw another video clip I don't know about.
The old one had kind of a low-poly Pixar look to it, which I loved. This one is trying to go photo-realistic. Doesn't seem right.
ermmm... low-poly? Or do you mean, normal poly for its time? The new one doesn't really look "photo-realistic" IMO. It looks a lot smoother and crisper. But photo-realistic? Not sure but I've raised sow my entire life and a big ol' stinky oinking baby machine like a real pig looks nothing like the pig in that video. (and I'm overlooking the walking, talking, wearing clothes part).
www.lordofduct.com - check out my blog

Space Puppy Studios - games for gamers by gamers
User avatar
Mozgus
Next-Gen
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 10:31 pm
Contact:

Post by Mozgus »

lordofduct wrote:ermmm... low-poly? Or do you mean, normal poly for its time? The new one doesn't really look "photo-realistic" IMO. It looks a lot smoother and crisper. But photo-realistic? Not sure but I've raised sow my entire life and a big ol' stinky oinking baby machine like a real pig looks nothing like the pig in that video. (and I'm overlooking the walking, talking, wearing clothes part).
Why ya gatta bust balls? Yes it was low poly even for it's time, which is fine. Yes it had a distinctive visual style. It was not aiming for photo-realism like this new one seems to be. And you just described EXACTLY WHY I don't think realistic graphics are the right direction here; anthropomorphic pigs. I don't NEED to see Pej's oil filled skin pores.
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Post by Niode »

Mozgus wrote:
lordofduct wrote:ermmm... low-poly? Or do you mean, normal poly for its time? The new one doesn't really look "photo-realistic" IMO. It looks a lot smoother and crisper. But photo-realistic? Not sure but I've raised sow my entire life and a big ol' stinky oinking baby machine like a real pig looks nothing like the pig in that video. (and I'm overlooking the walking, talking, wearing clothes part).
Why ya gatta bust balls? Yes it was low poly even for it's time, which is fine. Yes it had a distinctive visual style. It was not aiming for photo-realism like this new one seems to be. And you just described EXACTLY WHY I don't think realistic graphics are the right direction here; anthropomorphic pigs. I don't NEED to see Pej's oil filled skin pores.
Photo-realism?! Where in that video was there photo-realism. If that video was photo-realistic then why doesn't the world I see out of the window look like fucking Pixar-ville?

Just seems like you're trying to find something to dislike about the game Mozgus. I'm gonna wait and see how it turns out come launch day. Likewise with the new POP. I may dislike the change in style but i'll still give it a chance.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
User avatar
Mozgus
Next-Gen
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 10:31 pm
Contact:

Post by Mozgus »

Niode wrote:Photo-realism?! Where in that video was there photo-realism. If that video was photo-realistic then why doesn't the world I see out of the window look like fucking Pixar-ville?

Just seems like you're trying to find something to dislike about the game Mozgus. I'm gonna wait and see how it turns out come launch day. Likewise with the new POP. I may dislike the change in style but i'll still give it a chance.
That doesn't look a fucking thing like Pej, and you can't argue that. It doesn't sound like him either. The first game was very clearly a fantasy world. From what little we've seen here, it looks like a boring desert, just like the kind we have on our planet. Anyone who isn't skeptical about BG&E2 after seeing this trailer, and reading about their intentions, is very clearly wearing the goggles. UbiSoft loves to fuck up a good thing. Look at their track record.

Again, I said skeptical. I didn't say it's going to be bad. So I don't want to hear anyone shitting their pants and crying.
peace4myheart
128-bit
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:34 am
Location: Deep In The Heart Of Texas

Post by peace4myheart »

Mozgus wrote:
Again, I said skeptical. I didn't say it's going to be bad. So I don't want to hear anyone shitting their pants and crying.
Somebody didn't get the memo about "Faith". Stop being such a skeptic. Worse comes to worst, start praying. :lol:
Niode
Next-Gen
Posts: 7831
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: UK

Post by Niode »

Mozgus wrote:
Niode wrote:Photo-realism?! Where in that video was there photo-realism. If that video was photo-realistic then why doesn't the world I see out of the window look like fucking Pixar-ville?

Just seems like you're trying to find something to dislike about the game Mozgus. I'm gonna wait and see how it turns out come launch day. Likewise with the new POP. I may dislike the change in style but i'll still give it a chance.
That doesn't look a fucking thing like Pej, and you can't argue that. It doesn't sound like him either. The first game was very clearly a fantasy world. From what little we've seen here, it looks like a boring desert, just like the kind we have on our planet. Anyone who isn't skeptical about BG&E2 after seeing this trailer, and reading about their intentions, is very clearly wearing the goggles. UbiSoft loves to fuck up a good thing. Look at their track record.

Again, I said skeptical. I didn't say it's going to be bad. So I don't want to hear anyone shitting their pants and crying.
I don't see where the game is photo-realistic at all... Where in that video is it photo-realistic. Please point it out to me.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
RadarScope1
Next-Gen
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Missouri

Post by RadarScope1 »

I'm hyped for the new PoP. Looks like it could have huge potential. Good on them for not trying to do more of the same go for a series reboot. As for BG&E I yet have to finish the first one...
User avatar
AwesomeMonstar
128-bit
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:28 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Post by AwesomeMonstar »

Niode wrote:Buergh, why does ubisoft think that they have to do a Nintendo. First the cell shaded POP now they're watering down BG&E2?

Why Ubi, why?!
Would you rather that or another Warrior Within? "YOU BITCH!!!"
Don't that just look oh so tasty?
NES-GB-GENESIS-SNES-GBC-32X-SATURN-3DO-N64-DREAMCAST-GBA-PS2-XBOX-GAMECUBE-DS-PSP-WII-360
soniklife
24-bit
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:30 pm
Contact:

Post by soniklife »

totally unexpected. beyond & good evil was probably my favorite game from the previous generation. i enjoyed every aspect of the game a great deal. hopefully the sequel can be as good.
Post Reply