Beyond Good and Evil 2:)
- lordofduct
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:57 pm
- Location: West Palm Beach
ermmm... low-poly? Or do you mean, normal poly for its time? The new one doesn't really look "photo-realistic" IMO. It looks a lot smoother and crisper. But photo-realistic? Not sure but I've raised sow my entire life and a big ol' stinky oinking baby machine like a real pig looks nothing like the pig in that video. (and I'm overlooking the walking, talking, wearing clothes part).Mozgus wrote:The old one had kind of a low-poly Pixar look to it, which I loved. This one is trying to go photo-realistic. Doesn't seem right.lordofduct wrote:What's the new style? It looks like the old one to me, with better graphics and stuff.
unless you guys saw another video clip I don't know about.
Why ya gatta bust balls? Yes it was low poly even for it's time, which is fine. Yes it had a distinctive visual style. It was not aiming for photo-realism like this new one seems to be. And you just described EXACTLY WHY I don't think realistic graphics are the right direction here; anthropomorphic pigs. I don't NEED to see Pej's oil filled skin pores.lordofduct wrote:ermmm... low-poly? Or do you mean, normal poly for its time? The new one doesn't really look "photo-realistic" IMO. It looks a lot smoother and crisper. But photo-realistic? Not sure but I've raised sow my entire life and a big ol' stinky oinking baby machine like a real pig looks nothing like the pig in that video. (and I'm overlooking the walking, talking, wearing clothes part).
Photo-realism?! Where in that video was there photo-realism. If that video was photo-realistic then why doesn't the world I see out of the window look like fucking Pixar-ville?Mozgus wrote:Why ya gatta bust balls? Yes it was low poly even for it's time, which is fine. Yes it had a distinctive visual style. It was not aiming for photo-realism like this new one seems to be. And you just described EXACTLY WHY I don't think realistic graphics are the right direction here; anthropomorphic pigs. I don't NEED to see Pej's oil filled skin pores.lordofduct wrote:ermmm... low-poly? Or do you mean, normal poly for its time? The new one doesn't really look "photo-realistic" IMO. It looks a lot smoother and crisper. But photo-realistic? Not sure but I've raised sow my entire life and a big ol' stinky oinking baby machine like a real pig looks nothing like the pig in that video. (and I'm overlooking the walking, talking, wearing clothes part).
Just seems like you're trying to find something to dislike about the game Mozgus. I'm gonna wait and see how it turns out come launch day. Likewise with the new POP. I may dislike the change in style but i'll still give it a chance.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
That doesn't look a fucking thing like Pej, and you can't argue that. It doesn't sound like him either. The first game was very clearly a fantasy world. From what little we've seen here, it looks like a boring desert, just like the kind we have on our planet. Anyone who isn't skeptical about BG&E2 after seeing this trailer, and reading about their intentions, is very clearly wearing the goggles. UbiSoft loves to fuck up a good thing. Look at their track record.Niode wrote:Photo-realism?! Where in that video was there photo-realism. If that video was photo-realistic then why doesn't the world I see out of the window look like fucking Pixar-ville?
Just seems like you're trying to find something to dislike about the game Mozgus. I'm gonna wait and see how it turns out come launch day. Likewise with the new POP. I may dislike the change in style but i'll still give it a chance.
Again, I said skeptical. I didn't say it's going to be bad. So I don't want to hear anyone shitting their pants and crying.
-
peace4myheart
- 128-bit
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:34 am
- Location: Deep In The Heart Of Texas
I don't see where the game is photo-realistic at all... Where in that video is it photo-realistic. Please point it out to me.Mozgus wrote:That doesn't look a fucking thing like Pej, and you can't argue that. It doesn't sound like him either. The first game was very clearly a fantasy world. From what little we've seen here, it looks like a boring desert, just like the kind we have on our planet. Anyone who isn't skeptical about BG&E2 after seeing this trailer, and reading about their intentions, is very clearly wearing the goggles. UbiSoft loves to fuck up a good thing. Look at their track record.Niode wrote:Photo-realism?! Where in that video was there photo-realism. If that video was photo-realistic then why doesn't the world I see out of the window look like fucking Pixar-ville?
Just seems like you're trying to find something to dislike about the game Mozgus. I'm gonna wait and see how it turns out come launch day. Likewise with the new POP. I may dislike the change in style but i'll still give it a chance.
Again, I said skeptical. I didn't say it's going to be bad. So I don't want to hear anyone shitting their pants and crying.
Marurun wrote:Don’t mind-shart your pants, guys
-
RadarScope1
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:01 pm
- Location: Missouri
- AwesomeMonstar
- 128-bit
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:28 pm
- Location: New Orleans, LA
Would you rather that or another Warrior Within? "YOU BITCH!!!"Niode wrote:Buergh, why does ubisoft think that they have to do a Nintendo. First the cell shaded POP now they're watering down BG&E2?
Why Ubi, why?!
Don't that just look oh so tasty?
NES-GB-GENESIS-SNES-GBC-32X-SATURN-3DO-N64-DREAMCAST-GBA-PS2-XBOX-GAMECUBE-DS-PSP-WII-360
NES-GB-GENESIS-SNES-GBC-32X-SATURN-3DO-N64-DREAMCAST-GBA-PS2-XBOX-GAMECUBE-DS-PSP-WII-360
