S-Video
-
DinnerX
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
- Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge
Re: S-Video
The biggest advantage for me of s-video over composite is that static images look steady instead of having all that dot crawling business.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.
Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
Re: S-Video
Summed it up very well.Redifer wrote:I must correct some information here:
RF - Video and audio over one wire.
Composhit - Video over a single wire, audio over separate wires.
S-video - Video separated into luminance and chroma (one wire each, the other pins are for ground). This helps eliminate crosstalk and other interference providing for a picture that isn't vomit-inducing like composhit. All consoles should be hooked up with AT LEAST s-video.
Component. - Video separated into 3 wires, luminance, red difference and blue difference. The TV figures out what is supposed to be the color green. Better than s-video.
RGB - Discrete color transmission. Usually over 5 wires as RBGHV.
HDMI - Perfect digital transfer, even over a cheap cable (stay away from Monster Cable, they are an overpriced rip off and they do not offer anything more than other HDMI cables). However if the source is shit, HDMI will not magically transform it into a perfect digital signal. It will remain perfectly shitty.
For old consoles, you should use RGB or component if you can. Otherwise go with S-Video.
- Hobie-wan
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 21705
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
- Contact:
Re: S-Video
Have a look at my pictures showing the difference of RF/Composite/Svideo/VGA over here.
VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
I've never met a pun I didn't like. - Stark
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
-
ATARI800XLfan
- 128-bit
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:01 pm
- Location: Indiana U.S.A
Re: S-Video
So I guess the fact I am still using RF on my Sega Saturn is a bad thing, on a LCD TV too.Redifer wrote:I must correct some information here:
RF - Video and audio over one wire.
Composhit - Video over a single wire, audio over separate wires.
S-video - Video separated into luminance and chroma (one wire each, the other pins are for ground). This helps eliminate crosstalk and other interference providing for a picture that isn't vomit-inducing like composhit. All consoles should be hooked up with AT LEAST s-video.
Component. - Video separated into 3 wires, luminance, red difference and blue difference. The TV figures out what is supposed to be the color green. Better than s-video.
RGB - Discrete color transmission. Usually over 5 wires as RBGHV.
HDMI - Perfect digital transfer, even over a cheap cable (stay away from Monster Cable, they are an overpriced rip off and they do not offer anything more than other HDMI cables). However if the source is shit, HDMI will not magically transform it into a perfect digital signal. It will remain perfectly shitty.
- BoringSupreez
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 9738
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: S-Video
Woah. I am suddenly no longer satisfied with S-video. That VGA looks awesome.Hobie-wan wrote:Have a look at my pictures showing the difference of RF/Composite/Svideo/VGA over here.
VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
Um, duh.ATARI800XLfan wrote:So I guess the fact I am still using RF on my Sega Saturn is a bad thing, on a LCD TV too.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
Re: S-Video
I told myself for a long time that whatever is original is best...but you're absolutely right, that VGA picture is crisp.BoringSupreez wrote:Woah. I am suddenly no longer satisfied with S-video. That VGA looks awesome.
Re: S-Video
I you mean VGA over "Composite" rite??? There is no "Component" on the comparisons examples to verify your statement. DC doesn't provided such a video output (which is fine by me as VGA looks much superior over nasty Component cables IMO)VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
Re: S-Video
Composite is preferred on my TV. It may depend on the quality of your comb filter. My set has a 3d digital comb filter. I don't get jitter or dot crawl. I do get ever so slight rainbow effects in text that is one pixel in thickness, but I have only noticed this on one game so far (Earthbound).
S-video, on the PlayStation at least, is too sharp, and this is with sharpness set to minimum. Composite, while less defined, looks good with the sharpness set a little higher.
I suppose it will come down to your comb filter, and how large your TV is. I have a 32" and sit about six feet away. S-video is too sharp at that size and I prefer the look for composite on my SNES and PlayStation. Both systems are known for excellent composite output, though.
That said, my Wii looks pretty bad with composite, and I use component cables for it.
S-video, on the PlayStation at least, is too sharp, and this is with sharpness set to minimum. Composite, while less defined, looks good with the sharpness set a little higher.
I suppose it will come down to your comb filter, and how large your TV is. I have a 32" and sit about six feet away. S-video is too sharp at that size and I prefer the look for composite on my SNES and PlayStation. Both systems are known for excellent composite output, though.
That said, my Wii looks pretty bad with composite, and I use component cables for it.
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
Re: S-Video
Woah slow down there turbo lol! Yes! VGA is wonderful but keep in mind that only two consoles to my recollection actually support true VGA 640x480 or higher output (Dreamcast being the former and Xbox 360 being the latter). Dreamcast was truly a console ahead of its timeWoah. I am suddenly no longer satisfied with S-video. That VGA looks awesome.
- Hobie-wan
- Next-Gen
- Posts: 21705
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
- Contact:
Re: S-Video
Component, RGB, and VGA are pretty comparable for quality, but obviously having a sync signal helps VGA be better. I said merely said 'pretty close'. Certainly closer than any of the other options from Svideo on down. Someone with an XBox could compare VGA and Component with the same picture from the same console but it shouldn't be a drastic difference like the others.CD AGES wrote:I you mean VGA over "Composite" rite??? There is no "Component" on the comparisons examples to verify your statement. DC doesn't provided such a video output (which is fine by me as VGA looks much superior over nasty Component cables IMO)VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
I've never met a pun I didn't like. - Stark
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list
My trade, sale and services - Rough want list - Shipping weight reference chart - AC Power Adapter reference list