S-Video

Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
DinnerX
Next-Gen
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Trapped in a Karate Kid cartridge

Re: S-Video

Post by DinnerX »

The biggest advantage for me of s-video over composite is that static images look steady instead of having all that dot crawling business.
Since this signature affects old posts, I'm leaving a message here in case anyone searches for my username. This account died in early 2013. I am no longer a fundamentalist.

Don't add to my problems by pretending my past views are still held in the present. I do not have any patience for that. Feel free to ask me what I think now.
User avatar
Inazuma
Next-Gen
Posts: 2940
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: S-Video

Post by Inazuma »

Redifer wrote:I must correct some information here:

RF - Video and audio over one wire.

Composhit - Video over a single wire, audio over separate wires.

S-video - Video separated into luminance and chroma (one wire each, the other pins are for ground). This helps eliminate crosstalk and other interference providing for a picture that isn't vomit-inducing like composhit. All consoles should be hooked up with AT LEAST s-video.

Component. - Video separated into 3 wires, luminance, red difference and blue difference. The TV figures out what is supposed to be the color green. Better than s-video.

RGB - Discrete color transmission. Usually over 5 wires as RBGHV.

HDMI - Perfect digital transfer, even over a cheap cable (stay away from Monster Cable, they are an overpriced rip off and they do not offer anything more than other HDMI cables). However if the source is shit, HDMI will not magically transform it into a perfect digital signal. It will remain perfectly shitty.
Summed it up very well.

For old consoles, you should use RGB or component if you can. Otherwise go with S-Video.
User avatar
Hobie-wan
Next-Gen
Posts: 21705
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
Contact:

Re: S-Video

Post by Hobie-wan »

Have a look at my pictures showing the difference of RF/Composite/Svideo/VGA over here.

VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
ATARI800XLfan
128-bit
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: Indiana U.S.A

Re: S-Video

Post by ATARI800XLfan »

Redifer wrote:I must correct some information here:

RF - Video and audio over one wire.

Composhit - Video over a single wire, audio over separate wires.

S-video - Video separated into luminance and chroma (one wire each, the other pins are for ground). This helps eliminate crosstalk and other interference providing for a picture that isn't vomit-inducing like composhit. All consoles should be hooked up with AT LEAST s-video.

Component. - Video separated into 3 wires, luminance, red difference and blue difference. The TV figures out what is supposed to be the color green. Better than s-video.

RGB - Discrete color transmission. Usually over 5 wires as RBGHV.

HDMI - Perfect digital transfer, even over a cheap cable (stay away from Monster Cable, they are an overpriced rip off and they do not offer anything more than other HDMI cables). However if the source is shit, HDMI will not magically transform it into a perfect digital signal. It will remain perfectly shitty.
So I guess the fact I am still using RF on my Sega Saturn is a bad thing, on a LCD TV too.
User avatar
BoringSupreez
Next-Gen
Posts: 9738
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: S-Video

Post by BoringSupreez »

Hobie-wan wrote:Have a look at my pictures showing the difference of RF/Composite/Svideo/VGA over here.

VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
Woah. I am suddenly no longer satisfied with S-video. That VGA looks awesome.
ATARI800XLfan wrote:So I guess the fact I am still using RF on my Sega Saturn is a bad thing, on a LCD TV too.
Um, duh.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
User avatar
o.pwuaioc
Next-Gen
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: I miss NYC.

Re: S-Video

Post by o.pwuaioc »

BoringSupreez wrote:Woah. I am suddenly no longer satisfied with S-video. That VGA looks awesome.
I told myself for a long time that whatever is original is best...but you're absolutely right, that VGA picture is crisp.
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: S-Video

Post by CD AGES »

VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
I you mean VGA over "Composite" rite??? There is no "Component" on the comparisons examples to verify your statement. DC doesn't provided such a video output (which is fine by me as VGA looks much superior over nasty Component cables IMO)
User avatar
Zing
Next-Gen
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: S-Video

Post by Zing »

Composite is preferred on my TV. It may depend on the quality of your comb filter. My set has a 3d digital comb filter. I don't get jitter or dot crawl. I do get ever so slight rainbow effects in text that is one pixel in thickness, but I have only noticed this on one game so far (Earthbound).

S-video, on the PlayStation at least, is too sharp, and this is with sharpness set to minimum. Composite, while less defined, looks good with the sharpness set a little higher.

I suppose it will come down to your comb filter, and how large your TV is. I have a 32" and sit about six feet away. S-video is too sharp at that size and I prefer the look for composite on my SNES and PlayStation. Both systems are known for excellent composite output, though.

That said, my Wii looks pretty bad with composite, and I use component cables for it.
Selling half my NES/SNES/PS1 collection (ending Dec 1):
http://tinyurl.com/zingebay
User avatar
CD AGES
Next-Gen
Posts: 2208
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Re: S-Video

Post by CD AGES »

Woah. I am suddenly no longer satisfied with S-video. That VGA looks awesome.
Woah slow down there turbo lol! Yes! VGA is wonderful but keep in mind that only two consoles to my recollection actually support true VGA 640x480 or higher output (Dreamcast being the former and Xbox 360 being the latter). Dreamcast was truly a console ahead of its time :)
User avatar
Hobie-wan
Next-Gen
Posts: 21705
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Under a pile of retro stuff in H-town
Contact:

Re: S-Video

Post by Hobie-wan »

CD AGES wrote:
VGA is pretty close to component as far as quality goes.
I you mean VGA over "Composite" rite??? There is no "Component" on the comparisons examples to verify your statement. DC doesn't provided such a video output (which is fine by me as VGA looks much superior over nasty Component cables IMO)
Component, RGB, and VGA are pretty comparable for quality, but obviously having a sync signal helps VGA be better. I said merely said 'pretty close'. Certainly closer than any of the other options from Svideo on down. Someone with an XBox could compare VGA and Component with the same picture from the same console but it shouldn't be a drastic difference like the others.
Post Reply